Navan vs Ramp
Eleven of fourteen models named Navan first on the direct prompt; zero named Ramp. Navan was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Ramp by thirteen and Navan carries 67 labels and Ramp 38, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in seventeen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate travel management page.
By framing
NavanFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRamp
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Navan and Ramp were named in the same answer 183 times, of the 320 answers naming Navan and the 1084 naming Ramp. In those answers Ramp took the first choice fifty-two times and Navan forty-two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | ||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | | |
Navan Ramp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Navan on the left and Ramp on the right.The direct prompt
Navan first, Ramp an alternative
11 of 14 modelsRamp was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about Navan
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“these are the travel management platforms that consistently draw the most cautionary feedback: ### Navan, formerly TripActions” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“generally well reviewed, but some users complain about higher-than-direct booking prices, booking/approval friction, and support issues” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some users have reported booking confusion, excessive steps, miscommunication, and untrustworthy reservation confirmations.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some of the top options include Navan, Perk, and Routespring, which offer all-in-one platforms with AI-powered booking, expense automation, and 24/7 support.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with 3 vendors: One modern (Navan or TravelPerk)... modern all-in-one platforms (Navan, TravelPerk, Spotnana) typically beat legacy TMCs on UX” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for mid-market companies 50-300+ employees that want a modern, all-in-one travel and expense platform with a consumer-grade interface.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Ramp
No label in this category carried a quote.
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.