| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 14% | 3 of 61 | 25% | 28 | criticized challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 9% → 14%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel managem | 9% | 14% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 9% → 14%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 61, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the strongest default choice is Booking.com for Business because it is positioned as a free, self-service business travel platform” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice
“praised for being a free, self-service tool that minimizes costs while still providing robust travel booking and management features” Mistral Small · Corporate travel managem · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a limited budget, Booking.com for Business and Perk are often the most cost-effective and user-friendly options” Mistral Small · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice
“Booking.com for Business is the clear winner if you want 100% free booking with no subscription or booking fees” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate travel managem · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Consumer booking sites like Expedia or Booking.com used as a business travel system ... generally lack policy enforcement” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
“PissedConsumer rates them low (1.6-1.9/5) for refunds and support—avoid for corporate needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
“their financial handling is often cited as problematic” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Free" or Low-Cost Tech Platforms (e.g., Booking.com for Business...) ... often do so by padding the base rates of flights and hotel rooms” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 81 answers that named Booking.com for Business and are not a share of its labels.
350 of the 406 domain citations in answers naming Booking.com for Business came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Booking.com for Business's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: news.booking.com/more-business-travel, business.booking.com/business-travel-hotels, business.booking.com/business-travel-payments, business.booking.com/business-travel-trends-2026, business.booking.com/business-travel-management-solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Booking.com for Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Booking.com for Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Booking.com for Business by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Booking.com for Business is among the products AI models recommend first in Corporate travel management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.