| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 53% | 1 of 61 | 13% | 67 | endorsed leader | =heldSince September 2026: 51% → 51%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 4% | 7 of 54 | 7% | 27 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 13 of 46 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate cards | Spend and procurement | 0% | 10 of 67 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 52% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense management | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 of 54, unchanged |
| Corporate travel managem | 51% | 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 51% → 51%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 61, unchanged |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 13 of 46 |
| Corporate cards | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 10 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 14 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 12 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Some of the top options include Navan, Perk, and Routespring, which offer all-in-one platforms with AI-powered booking, expense automation, and 24/7 support.” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate travel managem · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with 3 vendors: One modern (Navan or TravelPerk)... modern all-in-one platforms (Navan, TravelPerk, Spotnana) typically beat legacy TMCs on UX” Kimi K2 · Corporate travel managem · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for mid-market companies 50-300+ employees that want a modern, all-in-one travel and expense platform with a consumer-grade interface.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate travel managem · scale prompt · first choice
“modern platforms like Navan and TravelPerk are winning on user experience, AI booking assistance, and transparent pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“these are the travel management platforms that consistently draw the most cautionary feedback: ### Navan, formerly TripActions” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · hard negative
“generally well reviewed, but some users complain about higher-than-direct booking prices, booking/approval friction, and support issues” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some users have reported booking confusion, excessive steps, miscommunication, and untrustworthy reservation confirmations.” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
“self-serve travel management platforms, such as Engine, Itilite, Navan, and Perk, may have limitations and compliance gaps” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 306 of the 320 answers that named Navan and are not a share of its labels.
975 of the 1,175 domain citations in answers naming Navan came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 832 | 40 | 2026-09-25 | Expense management, Corporate travel managem | |
| Report or ebook | 156 | 0 | 2026-05-06 | Expense management, Corporate travel managem | |
| Case study | 150 | undated | |||
| News or press | 150 | 3 | 2026-09-09 | Expense management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 117 | 3 | 2026-08-09 | Expense management | |
| Template or tool | 58 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 26 | 2 | 2026-09-18 | Expense management | |
| Conference or event | 21 | 7 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 0 | 2025-10-15 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on navan.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page navan.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Navan's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: navan.com, navan.com/pricing, trust.navan.com, navan.com/product/navan-edge, navan.com/blog/category/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Navan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Navan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Navan by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Navan first in Corporate travel management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.