Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 7 of 104
AppDeck · 1 category · RankedAppDeck Board Portal
25Judge labels
6First choices
3Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Board for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 99 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 109
4%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 99
6%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise20 of 100
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
In board · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AppDeck Board Portal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 6% | 5 of 99 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AppDeck Board Portal held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Board · by segment
Mid-market▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 21 → 5 of 95
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 17 of 95
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 0% | 6% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 5 of 99 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AppDeck Board Portal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AppDeck Board Portal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels3
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labels2
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with OnBoard or AppDeck - They offer the best balance of modern features, mid-market pricing, and ease of use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · direct prompt · first choice
“OnBoard and AppDeck are likely the strongest fits — they offer modern UX and real reporting capabilities” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · scale prompt · first choice
“| Modern Reporting | Automating financial packs and reducing manual work. | AppDeck, Datasights |” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Board · scale prompt · first choice
“Switch to or choose AppDeck if your priority is automated financial reporting and avoiding per-seat licensing costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Board · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AppDeck Board Portal, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AppDeck Board Portal was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AppDeck Board Portal, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AppDeck Board Portal was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AppDeck Board Portal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named AppDeck Board Portal and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
appdeck.comYour site25
fast.io23
guideflow.com18
g2.com15
zipdo.co13
boardintelligence.com11
capterra.com11
imboard.ai11
clearpointstrategy.com10
softwareadvice.com10
122 of the 147 domain citations in answers naming AppDeck Board Portal came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
appdeck.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AppDeck Board Portal takes 6% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
appdeck.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AppDeck Board Portal takes 6% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “board reporting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “board reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“appdeck board portal”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- appdeck.com shared with AppDeck's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 185 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 132 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 133
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 5 of 99 in board
Segment leader
26%
OnBoard
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as AppDeck Board Portal
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AppDeck Board Portal; a claim can dispute any of them.
AppDeck 8
Follow AppDeck Board Portal
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AppDeck is the company behind AppDeck Board Portal.ShowHide
The company
AppDeck is the company behind AppDeck Board Portal.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A secure digital platform that centralizes board communication, document sharing, and governance workflows.
- For
- board chairs, corporate secretaries, directors, and executive teams
- Price stated
- Mid-market options like AppDeck cost $299/month with flat pricing and no per-director fees. appdeck.com/glossary/board-portal
- Starting price
- 299/month appdeck.com/glossary/board-portal
- Free plan or trial
- Free 14-day trial appdeck.com/guides/board-portal
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting, customers
What AppDeck Board Portal's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: appdeck.com/guides/board-portal, appdeck.com/glossary/board-portal, appdeck.com/products/board-portal, appdeck.com/compare/appdeck-vs-onboard, appdeck.com/compare/appdeck-vs-docsend. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AppDeck Board Portal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AppDeck Board Portal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AppDeck Board Portal by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AppDeck Board Portal is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AppDeck Board Portal, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.