Every category where a model named BoardEffect for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Board portals	Equity and corporate	2%	7 of 50	10%	20	accepted challenger
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	22 of 99	25%	16	criticized challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BoardEffect yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BoardEffect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2	2	6
Mistral Small	0	2	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	2	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	3	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	0	2	0	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels1

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative39 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels1

Scale-constrained13 labelsNone

Negative20 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative104 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. BoardEffect (now part of the Passageways family alongside OnBoard) - targets nonprofits and mid-sized organizations.” Llama 4 Maverick · Board portals · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“BoardEffect is ideal for nonprofits and mid-sized organizations, offering a balance of features and ease of use.” Mistral Small · Board portals · comparative prompt · alternative

“BoardEffect | Mission-driven or structured boards | AI agendas, secure workspaces, committee tools” Grok 4.1 Fast · Board · direct prompt · alternative

“Want nonprofit / mission-driven board portal with strong governance: BoardEffect” Muse Glimmer 30B · Board · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“User reviews indicate serious deterioration post-acquisition: Support has become "extremely difficult"” Kimi K2 · Board · negative prompt · hard negative

“a credible mid-market option, especially for mission-driven organizations, though the provided results are less specific for B2B commercial use” Perplexity Sonar · Board · direct prompt · soft negative

“Bugs, unintuitive navigation/document upload... Weak support (slow, non-local, unresponsive post-Diligent acquisition)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Board · negative prompt · soft negative

“Only consider BoardEffect if your use case is more nonprofit-style or you want something simpler.” GPT-5.4 mini · Board portals · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BoardEffect, over the 104 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BoardEffect was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Diligent Boards88 of 10432Not among the top eight

OnBoard78 of 10413Compare →

Nasdaq Boardvantage68 of 10410Compare →

Boardable55 of 10412Compare →

BoardPro35 of 1049Compare →

Azeus Convene32 of 1040Compare →

Board Intelligence25 of 1041Not among the top eight

Govenda18 of 1043Compare →

Aprio Board Portal18 of 1040Compare →

AppDeck Board Portal8 of 1041Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BoardEffect. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 99 of the 104 answers that named BoardEffect and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fast.io63

appdeck.com53

boardintelligence.com51

onboardmeetings.com46

capterra.com43

g2.com43

guideflow.com42

diligent.com35

learn.g2.com33

board-room.org29

438 of the 438 domain citations in answers naming BoardEffect came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

fast.io/resources/board-portal-comparison47

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-202643

guideflow.com/blog/board-management-software41

learn.g2.com/best-board-management-software33

onboardmeetings.com/blog/best-board-portals25

boardintelligence.com/blog/what-are-the-top-board-management-software-platforms-for-202524

fast.io/resources/board-reporting-software20

appdeck.com/blog/board-reporting-software-comparison18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

boardeffect.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BoardEffect takes 2% of first choices and OnBoard takes 49%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “board portal”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “board portals”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 2,900 a month (“boardeffect”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 60 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 178,253 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 10,405 · 1,353 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,274
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

25 ads · 25 text · 16 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2024, as DILIGENT BOARD MEMBER SERVICES, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 5 in the year, 20 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 50 in board portals

Segment leader

49%

OnBoard

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 104 answers
Its own site cited: in 99 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on boardeffect.com

1,594

subdomains included

Content

1,548

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

22 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Blog	1,104	undated	Entity management
Report or ebook	336	undated
Case study	42	undated
Comparison	21	undated
Template or tool	20	undated
Glossary or explainer	11	undated
Webinar or virtual event	7	undated
Conference or event	6	undated
News or press	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page boardeffect.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as BoardEffect

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BoardEffect; a claim can dispute any of them.

BoardEffect (Nasdaq) 1BoardEffect (by Nasdaq) 1BoardEffect (now under OnBoard) 1BoardEffect/Board Intelligence 1Boardeffect 1

Follow BoardEffect

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

BoardEffect is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: secure, intuitive, AI-powered governance software
boardeffect.com
For: mission-driven organizations
boardeffect.com
Integrations claimed: 100 boardeffect.com/platform
Certifications: NIST 2014 Cybersecurity frameworkHIPAA compliantISO 270012701727018SOC 1SOC 2HITECH
Customers named: International Network of ChurchesLouisiana Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Healthcare FoundationHospital Sisters Health SystemLouisiana Restaurant AssociationOrthoVirginiaKing Edward VI Foundation BirminghamPennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What BoardEffect's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: boardeffect.com, boardeffect.com/pricing, boardeffect.com/security, boardeffect.com/platform, boardeffect.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BoardEffect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BoardEffect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BoardEffect by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where BoardEffect is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name BoardEffect, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.