Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 64 → 30 of 102
2 categories · Named, not rankedBasedash
8Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Basedash was named 3 times in Financial reporting and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market31 of 105
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise58 of 109
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Basedash for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 31 of 105 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SEC and disclosure reporting | Accounting and close | 0% | 23 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Basedash held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial reporting · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 53 of 101, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 64 → 31 of 105 |
| Disclosure reporting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 63, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Basedash across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Basedash across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Basedash or Metabase - suitable for small finance teams (1–5 people) at startups or mid-market companies.” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Recommended for small finance teams at mid-market companies that want user-friendly, modern BI tools” Mistral Small · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For a more integrated financial management approach, Basedash is a solid alternative.” Mistral Small · Disclosure reporting · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Basedash, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Basedash was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Basedash, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Basedash was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Basedash. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Basedash and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
basedash.comYour site8
baremetrics.com3
intl.finebi.com2
taskade.com2
worldmetrics.org2
zipdo.co2
adora.ai1
amplitude.com1
checkthat.ai1
cloudeagle.ai1
Fifteen of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Basedash came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on basedash.com
2,705
subdomains included
Content
594
counted in the table below
Documentation
917
Product · Integration
11 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 307 | 63 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 223 | 18 | 2026-09-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 33 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Case study | 12 | 0 | 2025-10-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 4 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Best bi tools for saas companies compared 2026 blog
- 2026-09-27Qlik sense alternatives 2026 bi tools compared comparison
- 2026-09-26Best cloud native bi tools compared 2026 blog
- 2026-09-25Introducing basedash mcp write blog
- 2026-09-24Conversational analytics in bi tools compared 2026 blog
- 2026-09-23Bi tool security features by plan sso scim rls audit logs 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page basedash.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Basedash
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Basedash is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Basedash is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Analytics for the AI era; an AI-native business intelligence platform for teams that want trusted answers, dashboards, and reporting workflows without heavy BI setup.
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- $1000 MONTH basedash.com
- Starting price
- 1000 basedash.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start free basedash.com
- Integrations claimed
- 750 basedash.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISAML 2.0OIDC
- Customers named
- ParallelMatador AIHookdeckTaxfyleOddleFullEnrichOrdinalGumloop
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Basedash's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: basedash.com, basedash.com, basedash.com/pricing, basedash.com/security, basedash.com/features/scim. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Basedash's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Basedash, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Basedash by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Basedash is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Basedash, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.