| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 4% | 6 of 105 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 6 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Zoho Analytics: Ideal if you need deep drilldown capabilities and scheduled reporting with conditional filters” Mistral Small · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Zoho Analytics - couples dashboard drilldown with scheduled reporting and conditional filters.” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Zoho Analytics if the main need is repeatable KPI dashboards and scheduled reporting” Perplexity Sonar · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Tools like Zoho Analytics or Metabase score well for value/reliability in SMBs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial reporting · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 44 answers that named Zoho Analytics and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-nine of the 117 domain citations in answers naming Zoho Analytics came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Zoho Analytics's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zoho.com/analytics/cloud-bi.html, zoho.com/analytics/dashboards.html, zoho.com/analytics/zoho-sprints.html, zoho.com/analytics/bi-dashboard.html, zoho.com/analytics/zoho-commerce.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoho Analytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: