Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 → 28 of 102
Sigma · 2 categories · Named, not rankedSigma Computing
19Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sigma Computing was named 6 times in Financial reporting and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market27 of 105
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 109
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Sigma Computing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 27 of 105 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 0% | 70 of 78 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Sigma Computing held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial reporting · by segment
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 12 → 19 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 27 of 105 |
| SaaS metrics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 70 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Sigma Computing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Sigma Computing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“A warehouse-native BI tool that operates like an Excel spreadsheet on steroids.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Tableau or Sigma if your team has strong analytics expertise” Perplexity Sonar · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Users want spreadsheet-style work on warehouse data: Sigma” GPT-6 Luna · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“per-user pricing models used by Looker, Tableau, and Sigma become expensive fast when serving external customers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sigma Computing, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sigma Computing was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sigma Computing, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sigma Computing was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sigma Computing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 19 answers that named Sigma Computing and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
sigmacomputing.comYour site7
worldmetrics.org5
baremetrics.com4
basedash.com4
databox.com4
kanerika.com4
datarails.com3
domo.com3
finance-ai-index.com3
improvado.io3
Thirty-three of the forty domain citations in answers naming Sigma Computing came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sigmacomputing.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sigma Computing takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sigmacomputing.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sigma Computing takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “reporting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“sigma computing”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 248 a month
- Its company's site
- sigmacomputing.com shared with Sigma's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 67,518 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,682 · 542 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,080
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 105 in financial reporting
Segment leader
33%
Sage Intacct
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 19 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Sigma Computing
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sigma Computing; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sigma 5
Follow Sigma Computing
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Sigma is the company behind Sigma Computing.ShowHide
The company
Sigma is the company behind Sigma Computing.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sigma is the AI runtime for business. A governed platform where teams build and run AI apps and agents directly on live cloud warehouse data (Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery, Redshift).
- For
- teams of all sizes
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial sigmacomputing.com/product/why-sigma
- Integrations claimed
- 4 sigmacomputing.com/product/sigma-for-dashboards
- Customers named
- Seek DataFalconXWorkato
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, certifications, hosting
What Sigma Computing's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sigmacomputing.com/product/why-sigma, sigmacomputing.com/product/sigma-for-dashboards, sigmacomputing.com/customers/sigma-computing-partners-with-seek-data, sigmacomputing.com/customers/falconx-accelerates-business-insights-with-sigma, sigmacomputing.com/customers/workato-turns-to-sigmas-input-tables-to-drive-its-business-forward. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sigma Computing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sigma Computing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sigma Computing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Sigma Computing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sigma Computing, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.