AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Betterworks · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Betterworks

11Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Betterworks was named 4 times in Corporate performance ma, where Planful led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Betterworks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Corporate performance managementPlanning and analysis0%81 of 9950%4under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Betterworks held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 50 → 74 of 91
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 5 of 69, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Corporate performance ma0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 50 → 81 of 99

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Betterworks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labels2
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Steep learning curve, weak training support reported by some” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · soft negative
“Probably overkill if you're under 500 employees.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Betterworks, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Betterworks was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Anaplan8 of 111Not among the top eight
OneStream7 of 111Not among the top eight
Workday Adaptive Planning6 of 111Not among the top eight
Lattice6 of 110Not among the top eight
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM5 of 110Not among the top eight
Prophix3 of 110Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors3 of 110Not among the top eight
Planful2 of 111Not among the top eight
Vena2 of 111Not among the top eight
Datarails1 of 111Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Betterworks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Betterworks and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

betterworks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Betterworks takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “epm software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “epm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“betterworks”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
21 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 12,379 a month
Searches its site ranks for
6,670 · 149 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,041
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
34 ads · 29 text, 5 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2022, as Betterworks Systems INC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 3 in the year, 31 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 81 of 99 in corporate performance ma
Segment leader
22%
Planful
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
11 answers
Its own site cited
in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on betterworks.com
1,171
subdomains included
Content
207
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
17 · 8
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog101undated
Webinar or virtual event28undated
Case study21undated
News or press13undated
Conference or event11undated
Report or ebook10undated
Comparison10undated
Template or tool8undated
Glossary or explainer4undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page betterworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Betterworks

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Betterworks is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Talent intelligence powered by real-time performance management
For
HR leaders
Price stated
Pricing betterworks.com
Starting price
8 betterworks.com/plans
Certifications
ISO 27001Data Privacy Framework (DPF)Texas Risk and Authorization Management Program (TX-RAMP)SSOSAML
Hosting
US (North Virginia)EU (Ireland)
Customers named
IntuitFerrerCollinsonArcesiumThe Driving Force Group of CompaniesLivePersonGrupo PosadasDairy Farmers of America
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations

What Betterworks's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: betterworks.com, betterworks.com/plans, betterworks.com/security, betterworks.com/product/mcp, betterworks.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Betterworks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Betterworks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Betterworks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Betterworks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Betterworks, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at betterworks.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.