| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 38 of 83 | 45% | 29 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 38 of 83 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“HighRadius and BlackLine are considered safe picks for enterprise-scale matching” Llama 4 Maverick · Cash application · comparative prompt · first choice
“HighRadius and BlackLine are the safest picks for enterprise-scale matching” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cash application · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose BlackLine if your main goal is ensuring your accounts receivable data aligns seamlessly with your month-end accounting close” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strong for public/audit-focused teams; integrates cash app into broader financial close automation.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash application · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Avoid HighRadius, Esker, and most of Billtrust/BlackLine"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cash application · negative prompt · hard negative
“BlackLine is specifically described as having a core platform that is process-heavy and requires substantial ramp-up time, so it may be a poor fit” Perplexity Sonar · Cash application · negative prompt · soft negative
“Large enterprise systems like HighRadius or BlackLine are incredibly powerful but often require six-month implementation cycles” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Often overpriced and over-engineered for teams that don't need the full "accounting close" module suite it ships with.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cash application · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 105 answers that named BlackLine Cash Application and are not a share of its labels.
459 of the 459 domain citations in answers naming BlackLine Cash Application came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What BlackLine Cash Application's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: blackline.com/why-blackline, branding.blackline.com/blackline, blackline.com/blackline-mobile, blackline.com/invoice-to-cash/cash-application, blackline.com/resources/blackline-for-order-to-cash. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BlackLine Cash Application's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BlackLine Cash Application, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BlackLine Cash Application by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: