Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 58 → 56 of 57
9 categories · RankedBilltrust
324Judge labels
32First choices
68Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
9Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in B2B payment acceptance for enterprise buyers
Rank 4 of 79 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 38 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Billtrust →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business61 of 62
0%15 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market4 of 79
10%38 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 79
6%45 labels
accepted challenger
In accounts receivable auto · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Billtrust for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 10% | 4 of 79 | 11% | 38 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 6% | 7 of 94 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 6% | 6 of 108 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Chaser at 16% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 4% | 7 of 71 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 2% | 12 of 83 | 29% | 42 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Chargeback management | Receivables and billing | 2% | 14 of 81 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24% | |
| B2B BNPL and net terms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 33 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Resolve Pay at 56% | |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 37 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 92 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Billtrust held within the floor in all nine categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Accounts receivable auto · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 75
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 of 71, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | 0% | 5% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 6 of 108 |
| Accounts receivable auto | 12% | 9% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 4 of 79 |
| Chargeback management | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 14 of 81, unchanged |
| Invoicing software | 2% | 5% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 7 of 71 |
| B2B payment acceptance | 9% | 7% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 7 of 94 |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 12 of 83 |
| B2B BNPL and terms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 90, unchanged |
| Business bill pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 37 of 98 |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 92 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Billtrust across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Billtrust across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 13 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 15 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 11 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct87 labels18
Paraphrase66 labels13
Comparative73 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained29 labels1
Scale-constrained24 labelsNone
Negative45 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative324 labels in all, every segment counted; 32 of the 37 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Billtrust ranks as the best accounts receivable software solution, combining AI-powered automation, a unified end-to-end AR platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · Accounts receivable auto · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Billtrust. Its cash-application product is specifically focused on bringing together payment and remittance data” GPT-6 Luna · Cash application · direct prompt · first choice
“If you are a massive global brand with manual cash matching bottlenecks: Choose HighRadius or Billtrust.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · comparative prompt · first choice
“I would recommend starting with Chaser or Billtrust as they specifically target the mid-market segment” MiniMax M2.5 · B2B credit management · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Avoid for Your Criteria - Billtrust, Serrala, Esker, Versapay: Custom/transaction-based"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cash application · negative prompt · hard negative
“The Verdict: Avoid these unless you have a dedicated, internal IT team and a massive budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · hard negative
“The biggest red flags are HighRadius and Billtrust for standard contract terms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · negative prompt · hard negative
“Recommended to negotiate carefully or avoid standard contracts due to high costs” Mistral Small · Cash application · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Billtrust, over the 324 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Billtrust was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Billtrust, over the 324 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Billtrust was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Billtrust. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 317 of the 324 answers that named Billtrust and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
highradius.com191
chaserhq.com143
bluecopa.com113
upflow.io104
g2.com90
stuut.ai90
billtrust.comYour site88
worldmetrics.org86
emagia.com84
learn.g2.com80
981 of the 1,069 domain citations in answers naming Billtrust came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
billtrust.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Billtrust takes 10% of first choices and Upflow takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
billtrust.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Billtrust takes 10% of first choices and Upflow takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ar automation tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “accounts receivable automation software”
7
- Searches for its name, Google
- 6,600 a month (“billtrust”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 159 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 50,343 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,921 · 586 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,311
- Paid Google search
- 7 searches its ads show for, about 17 clicks and $718 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 4 of 79 in accounts receivable auto
Segment leader
17%
Upflow
- First choices
- 32 across its categories
- Named in
- 324 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 317 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on billtrust.com
2,611
subdomains included
Content
888
counted in the table below
Documentation
996
Product · Integration
21 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 378 | 6 | 2026-09-01 | Cash application, Accounts receivable auto | |
| News or press | 160 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | Accounts receivable auto, Cash application | |
| Glossary or explainer | 151 | 3 | 2026-09-04 | Cash application, Accounts receivable auto | |
| Podcast or video | 53 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | Accounts receivable auto, Global e-invoicing compl | |
| Report or ebook | 46 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ERP systems, Cash application | |
| Case study | 44 | 0 | 2025-11-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 40 | 1 | 2026-07-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | 0 | 2024-03-12 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 0 | 2025-12-12 | Accounts receivable auto, ERP systems |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Billtrust launches hyderabad capability center news or press
- 2026-09-04What is cash generation platform glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-01Virtual card payments blog
- 2026-08-27What is cash conversion cycle glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-25Best accounts receivable software manufacturers blog
- 2026-08-18Reduce dso blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page billtrust.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Billtrust
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Billtrust is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Billtrust is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Cash Generation Platform
- For
- B2B suppliers
- Price stated
- Billtrust offers tiered eCommerce packages—Essentials, Professional, and Enterprise billtrust.com/products/b2b-ecommerce-platform
- Integrations claimed
- 260 billtrust.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO 27001PCI DSSGDPRHIPAA BAAData Privacy Framework (DPF)NACHA
- Hosting
- United States of AmericaIreland
- Customers named
- PeakMcpherson OilCintasDesign AirBlazer ElectricPalmer DonavinWernerMaterials distributor
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial
What Billtrust's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: billtrust.com, trust.billtrust.com, billtrust.com/products/b2b-ecommerce-platform, billtrust.com/resources/case-studies, billtrust.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Billtrust's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Billtrust, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Billtrust by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Billtrust is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Billtrust, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.