AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Quadient Accounts Receivable · October 2026 Edition
Quadient · 1 category · Ranked

Quadient Accounts Receivable

46Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Cash application for mid-market buyers
Rank 24 of 83 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Quadient Accounts Receivable →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cash application · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quadient Accounts Receivable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cash applicationReceivables and billing0%24 of 830%21accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Quadient Accounts Receivable held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Cash application · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 14 → 25 of 82
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 8 → 21 of 79
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 42 of 58, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Cash application5%0%▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 → 24 of 83

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Quadient Accounts Receivable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K203104
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B00303

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative11 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Formerly YayPay, automates collections and gives customers a self-service portal... targeting mid-market finance teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cash application · direct prompt · alternative
“Excellent for mid-market teams that want to combine cash application with powerful AI-driven cash flow forecasting.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · scale prompt · alternative
“broader order-to-cash automation, but likely better if you need more than just cash application” Perplexity Sonar · Cash application · budget prompt · alternative
“Quadient AR is a highly reliable mid-market platform designed to help teams predict cash flows” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quadient Accounts Receivable, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quadient Accounts Receivable was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HighRadius33 of 4613Not among the top eight
Billtrust27 of 460Not among the top eight
BlackLine Cash Application20 of 462Not among the top eight
Versapay19 of 462Not among the top eight
Esker15 of 461Not among the top eight
Gaviti13 of 462Not among the top eight
Stuut13 of 462Not among the top eight
Upflow11 of 466Not among the top eight
Kolleno11 of 465Not among the top eight
Serrala11 of 460Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quadient Accounts Receivable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 46 answers that named Quadient Accounts Receivable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

highradius.com35
bluecopa.com34
chaserhq.com25
stuut.ai22
upflow.io21
gitnux.org19
rex.inc18
thecfoclub.com18
cashbook.com15
worldmetrics.org15

222 of the 222 domain citations in answers naming Quadient Accounts Receivable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

quadient.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quadient Accounts Receivable takes 0% of first choices and Versapay takes 9%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cash application tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cash application software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
10 a month (“quadient accounts receivable”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its company's site
quadient.com shared with Quadient's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 131,433 a month
Searches its site ranks for
12,093 · 794 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,568
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $83 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
62+ ads · 46 text, 12 image, 4 video · 42 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Neopost USA Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 48 in the year, 14 before. 58 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 83 in cash application
Segment leader
9%
Versapay
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
46 answers
Its own site cited
in 46 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Quadient Accounts Receivable

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quadient Accounts Receivable; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quadient AR 10Quadient 3Quadient AR (formerly YayPay) 3Quadient AR (YayPay) 2Quadient A/R 1Quadient AR / YayPay 1YayPay 1

Follow Quadient Accounts Receivable

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Quadient is the company behind Quadient Accounts Receivable.
ShowHide

On record

Company records
Also from Quadient
Quadient AP, Quadient AR

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
KI-gestützte Software zur Automatisierung des Forderungsmanagements, die Zahlungseingänge um 34 % beschleunigt
Free plan or trial
Eine kostenfreie AR-Automatisierungsdemo, die auf Ihre Bedürfnisse und Arbeitsabläufe zugeschnitten ist. quadient.com/de-de/calculator/quadient-ar-roi-calculator
Customers named
CorneaGenCplServiceRocketGoToCheetah DigitalJumio
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Quadient Accounts Receivable's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: quadient.com/de-de/ar-collections-software, quadient.com/de/resources/quadient-ar-payment-portal, quadient.com/de-de/calculator/quadient-ar-roi-calculator, quadient.com/de-de/ebooks-papers/accounts-receivable-collections-playbook, quadient.com/de-de/ressourcen/2025-spark-matrix-accounts-receivable-applications. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quadient Accounts Receivable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quadient Accounts Receivable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quadient Accounts Receivable by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Quadient Accounts Receivable is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quadient Accounts Receivable, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quadient.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.