Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 61 → 70 of 82
4 categories · RankedEmagia
69Judge labels
2First choices
9Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Cash application for enterprise buyers
Rank 26 of 83 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Emagia →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business77 of 88
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market26 of 83
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 62
4%20 labels
accepted challenger
In cash application · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Emagia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 26 of 83 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 26 of 108 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Chaser at 16% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 28 of 79 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 75 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Emagia held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Cash application · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 57 → 26 of 79
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 19 → 4 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 57 → 26 of 83 |
| B2B credit management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 108, unchanged |
| Accounts receivable auto | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 28 of 79 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 75 of 102, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Emagia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Emagia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels2
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative21 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained18 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative69 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need rapid deployment and high automation, consider Stuut or Emagia.” Mistral Small · Cash application · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Emagia if cash flow forecasting and credit scoring are priorities” Kimi K2 · Cash application · comparative prompt · alternative
“Unified AR and credit risk analytics; strong in multi-ERP environments” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · comparative prompt · alternative
“Multi-ERP environment | Emagia, Cashbook, or Bluecopa” Kimi K2 · Cash application · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“often priced for mid-market or enterprise teams, and can start around $50,000/year for products like Emagia Cash Application” GPT-5.4 mini · Cash application · budget prompt · soft negative
“These heavyweight enterprise order-to-cash platforms are often overkill for SMBs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Emagia, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Emagia was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Emagia, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Emagia was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Emagia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 69 of the 69 answers that named Emagia and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
emagia.comYour site60
highradius.com42
bluecopa.com34
chaserhq.com34
upflow.io25
stuut.ai23
worldmetrics.org22
gitnux.org20
rex.inc19
thecfoclub.com19
238 of the 298 domain citations in answers naming Emagia came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
emagia.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Emagia takes 0% of first choices and Versapay takes 9%.ShowHide
Search and answers
emagia.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Emagia takes 0% of first choices and Versapay takes 9%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cash application tools”
6
Position for “cash application software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“emagia”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 75,872 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 18,918 · 529 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,369
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 26 of 83 in cash application
Segment leader
9%
Versapay
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 69 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 69 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on emagia.com
9,999
subdomains included
Content
8,940
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
63 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 7,147 | 0 | 2024-09-11 | Cash application, Account reconciliation | |
| Blog | 740 | 0 | 2023-10-09 | Cash application, Accounts receivable auto | |
| Report or ebook | 394 | 4 | 2026-09-23 | Cash application, Cash flow forecasting | |
| Podcast or video | 228 | 1 | 2026-08-26 | Cash application | |
| News or press | 190 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | Accounting software | |
| Conference or event | 101 | 0 | 2025-12-16 | ||
| Comparison | 97 | 0 | 2024-09-20 | Cash application, Procure-to-pay | |
| Template or tool | 22 | 0 | 2025-05-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 15 | 0 | 2023-12-12 | ||
| Case study | 6 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23How pe firms can optimize o2c performance report or ebook
- 2026-09-02Leader and star performer in the everest group o2c peak matrix assessment news or press
- 2026-08-26Navigating the future of e invoicing with ai report or ebook
- 2026-08-26Navigating the future of e invoicing with ai podcast or video
- 2026-08-21Deductions recovery ai agents business case report or ebook
- 2026-07-28Customer to cash kpis report or ebook
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 7, 2026 to October 9, 20262026年NACM西部学分会议圣地亚哥 · exhibits
- October 21, 2026 to October 22, 20262026年NACM Connect信贷会议芝加哥, US · exhibits
Last twelve months
- September 23, 2026 to September 25, 20262026年NACM南部地区信贷会议南湖市 · exhibited
- November 6, 2025NACM Credit in the West 2025 Conference – AnaheimAnaheim Marriott Suites, Anaheim · exhibited
- October 8, 2025 to October 10, 2025NACM Credit in the West 2025 Conference – SpokaneDoubleTree by Hilton Spokane City Center, Spokane · exhibited
As the event pages on emagia.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page emagia.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Emagia
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Emagia; a claim can dispute any of them.
Emagia / Esker 1Emagia Cash Application 1
Follow Emagia
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Emagia is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Emagia is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Generative AI for Finance; the world’s first generative AI solution for order-to-cash operations
- For
- finance operations executives; finance leaders; CFOs, Vice Presidents of Finance, Controllers, Treasury Managers, Credit Managers, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Managers, Order-to-Cash Process Owners, and Customer Financial Services Stakeholders
- Price stated
- GiaGPT is priced based on your requirement. emagia.com/products/giagpt
- Free plan or trial
- free, beta version emagia.com/products/giagpt
- Customers named
- AHAXylemConvatecUnisysCali BambooGlobal Pharma ManufacturerPharma manufacturer
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Emagia's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: emagia.com, emagia.com/products/giagpt, emagia.com/resources/case-studies, emagia.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Emagia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Emagia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Emagia by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Emagia is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Emagia, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.