Finance AI Index

Index › Products › BoardPAC · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

BoardPAC

16Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BoardPAC was named 3 times in Board portals and 1 other category, where OnBoard led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market20 of 50

under the label threshold

Enterprise13 of 48

under the label threshold

In board portals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BoardPAC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Board portals	Equity and corporate	0%	20 of 50	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 49%
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	62 of 99	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26%	goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BoardPAC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BoardPAC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BoardPAC, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BoardPAC was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Diligent Boards13 of 1611Not among the top eight

Nasdaq Boardvantage12 of 165Not among the top eight

OnBoard10 of 160Not among the top eight

Azeus Convene8 of 160Not among the top eight

Board Intelligence7 of 160Not among the top eight

BoardPro5 of 160Not among the top eight

Boardable5 of 160Not among the top eight

Govenda4 of 160Not among the top eight

BoardEffect3 of 160Not among the top eight

BoardSpace2 of 160Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BoardPAC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named BoardPAC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boardintelligence.com11

fast.io11

learn.g2.com9

diligent.com7

g2.com7

guideflow.com7

appdeck.com6

gitnux.org6

onboardmeetings.com6

worldmetrics.org6

Seventy-six of the seventy-six domain citations in answers naming BoardPAC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-board-management-software8

boardintelligence.com/blog/what-is-the-best-board-management-software-for-large-organizati7

guideflow.com/blog/board-management-software7

fast.io/resources/board-portal-comparison6

fast.io/resources/board-reporting-software6

boardintelligence.com/blog/what-are-the-top-board-management-software-platforms-for-20255

onboardmeetings.com/blog/enterprise-board-portal5

worldmetrics.org/best/board-report-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

board.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BoardPAC takes 0% of first choices and OnBoard takes 49%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “board portal”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “board portals”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 44,405 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 5,620 · 154 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,322
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 51 image, 51 text, 18 video · 106 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2022, as BOARD Americas, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 97 in the year, 23 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 20 of 50 in board portals

Segment leader

49%

OnBoard

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 16 answers
Its own site cited: in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on board.com

5,023

subdomains included

Content

1,350

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

8 · 39

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
News or press	444	4	2026-09-16
Blog	338	18	2026-09-25
Podcast or video	167	19	2026-09-08
Case study	162	5	2026-09-07
Webinar or virtual event	119	15	2027-04-21
Conference or event	62	0	2024-10-13
Glossary or explainer	32	2	2026-08-18
Report or ebook	19	0	2026-05-27
Comparison	7	0	2026-05-05

Most recent

2027-04-21Retail technology show 2027 webinar or virtual event
2026-11-04Fpa trends webinar webinar or virtual event
2026-10-28Retail breakfast nyc webinar or virtual event
2026-10-27Nyc cfo executive summit webinar or virtual event
2026-10-22See the board supply chain agent in action webinar or virtual event
2026-10-22Ibf orlando 2026 webinar or virtual event

Events in person

Upcoming

October 15, 2026Board Beyond Roma 2026 | Agentic Planning e AIPalazzo Ripetta, Roma, Italy · hosts
October 15, 2026Board Beyond Roadshow South Africa 2026Adapt IT Johannesburg Campus, Midrand, South Africa · hosts

Last twelve months

September 16, 2026Board Beyond Roadshow Nordics 2026Tändstickspalatset, Stockholm, Sweden · hosted
reported December 2025Gartner Supply Chain Symposium/Xpo™ conferenceLondon · attended

As the event pages on board.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page board.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow BoardPAC

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

BoardPAC is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Customers named: Groupe SEBL'ORÉAL GroupThe Very GroupVelcro Companies
Not stated on the pages read: Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What BoardPAC's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: board.com, board.com/pricing, board.com/blog/tag/security, board.com/platform, board.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BoardPAC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BoardPAC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BoardPAC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where BoardPAC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name BoardPAC, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.