Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 10 → 17 of 46
4 categories · RankedChargebee
41Judge labels
0First choices
10Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Invoicing software for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 48
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 71
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise24 of 111
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
In invoicing software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Chargebee for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 17 of 71 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Merchants of record | Receivables and billing | 0% | 44 of 45 | 75% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Paddle at 28% | |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 55 of 79 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 36 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Chargebee held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Invoicing software · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 21 → 14 of 65
Enterprise▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 5 → 20 of 96
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 17 of 71 |
| Merchants of record | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 44 of 45, unchanged |
| Accounts receivable auto | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 79, unchanged |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 94, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Chargebee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Chargebee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for Subscription & SaaS Businesses: Chargebee ... Choose Chargebee if you are a SaaS company charging monthly recurring revenue.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Invoicing software · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Subscription, SaaS, or Usage-Based B2B Billing: Chargebee or Stripe Billing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Invoicing software · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Complex, Subscription, or Usage-Based Billing: Chargebee or Stripe Billing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Invoicing software · direct prompt · alternative
“If you're a SaaS/subscription business, Chargebee is purpose-built for your needs.” Kimi K2 · Invoicing software · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Chargebee is a solid subscription billing engine. But it is billing software, not a payment processor and not a merchant of record.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Merchants of record · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid stacking separate tools (e.g., Stripe + Chargebee + Tax plugin)” Kimi K2 · Merchants of record · budget prompt · soft negative
“Chargebee often keeps tax liability on you unless paired” Grok 4.1 Fast · Merchants of record · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chargebee, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chargebee was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chargebee, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chargebee was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chargebee. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 41 answers that named Chargebee and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
thecfoclub.com14
g2.com9
guideflow.com9
freemius.com7
paddle.com7
resources.rework.com7
blog.alguna.com6
chargebee.comYour site6
dodopayments.com6
gitnux.org6
Seventy-one of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming Chargebee came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
chargebee.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chargebee takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Invoice takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
chargebee.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chargebee takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Invoice takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “invoicing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “invoicing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“chargebee”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 140 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 69,891 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,794 · 790 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,873
- Paid Google search
- 7 searches its ads show for, about 78 clicks and $1,889 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 71 in invoicing software
Segment leader
24%
Zoho Invoice
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 41 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 39 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on chargebee.com
1,548
subdomains included
Content
1,070
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
32 · 35
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 677 | 10 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Case study | 101 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 91 | 0 | 2025-10-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 77 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 49 | 0 | 2021-04-29 | ||
| Comparison | 30 | 0 | 2025-10-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 23 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 15 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Subscription cancellation dark patterns 5 steps to help audit your cancel flow blog
- 2026-09-10What works in go to market the new revenue playbook blog
- 2026-08-31How to monetize ai features faster blog
- 2026-08-25How to price ai products framework for choosing the right model blog
- 2026-08-13Chargebee named a leader in the 2026 gartner magic quadrant for recurring billing applications blog
- 2026-08-12Subscription business model blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 6, 2026Beelieve roadshow BerlinBerlin · hosts
- October 14, 2026Beelieve roadshow ParisParis · hosts
Last twelve months
- September 22, 2026Beelieve New YorkNew York City · hosted
- September 15, 2026Beelieve roadshow SydneySydney · hosted
- June 4, 2026Beelieve '26 LondonTobacco Dock, London · hosted
- April 15, 2026 to April 16, 2026Beelieve '26 San FranciscoFort Mason, San Francisco · hosted
As the event pages on chargebee.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page chargebee.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Chargebee
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Chargebee is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Chargebee is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Billing & Monetization for SaaS and AI Companies
- For
- SaaS and AI companies
- Price stated
- Pricing chargebee.com
- Starting price
- 0 chargebee.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial chargebee.com
- Integrations claimed
- 480 chargebee.com · 40 chargebee.com/pricing · 60 chargebee.com/features pages disagree
- Certifications
- 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ Leader for Recurring Billing ApplicationsASC 606IFRS 15PCI DSS Level 1ISO 27001:2022SOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IIEU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework
- Hosting
- 150+ countries
- Customers named
- WherebyPretDeliverrLegalZoomSesameFMGZenchefZapier
What Chargebee's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: chargebee.com, chargebee.com/pricing, chargebee.com/security, chargebee.com/features, chargebee.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chargebee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chargebee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chargebee by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Chargebee is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Chargebee, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.