Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 41 → 42 of 46
NetSuite · 1 category · RankedNetSuite SuiteBilling
56Judge labels
12First choices
4Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
18% in Invoicing software for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of NetSuite SuiteBilling →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business44 of 48
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 71
8%18 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise1 of 111
18%35 labels
accepted challenger
In invoicing software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named NetSuite SuiteBilling for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 8% | 6 of 71 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, NetSuite SuiteBilling held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Invoicing software · by segment
Mid-market▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 65
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 20% → 22%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 20% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 96, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | 5% | 9% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 5% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 of 71, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated NetSuite SuiteBilling across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated NetSuite SuiteBilling across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels7
Paraphrase13 labels3
Comparative12 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative56 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“NetSuite - recommended for mid-market and growing businesses that need billing tightly connected to broader financial operations.” Llama 4 Maverick · Invoicing software · direct prompt · first choice
“Oracle NetSuite — Best Overall for Full-Stack Needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Invoicing software · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest single pick is usually NetSuite” Perplexity Sonar · Invoicing software · direct prompt · first choice
“If integrated ERP is key: Go NetSuite.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Invoicing software · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NetSuite SuiteBilling, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetSuite SuiteBilling was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NetSuite SuiteBilling, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetSuite SuiteBilling was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NetSuite SuiteBilling. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 55 answers that named NetSuite SuiteBilling and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com34
forbes.com30
g2.com24
gitnux.org21
thecfoclub.com21
highradius.com18
bill.com17
sourceforge.net16
swydo.com16
techrepublic.com16
213 of the 213 domain citations in answers naming NetSuite SuiteBilling came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where NetSuite SuiteBilling stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where NetSuite SuiteBilling stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“netsuite suitebilling”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on NetSuite's site (netsuite.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 6 of 71 in invoicing software
Segment leader
24%
Zoho Invoice
- First choices
- 12 across its categories
- Named in
- 55 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 52 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as NetSuite SuiteBilling
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as NetSuite SuiteBilling; a claim can dispute any of them.
NetSuite 15Oracle NetSuite 2NetSuite ERP 1
Follow NetSuite SuiteBilling
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
NetSuite is the company behind NetSuite SuiteBilling.ShowHide
The company
NetSuite is the company behind NetSuite SuiteBilling.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from NetSuite
- NetSuite AP, NetSuite AP Automation, NetSuite AR, NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management, NetSuite ERP, NetSuite Fixed Assets, NetSuite Fixed Assets Management, NetSuite Lease Accounting and 5 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Streamline billing operations with real-time visibility into financial and billing activity. Consolidate invoicing, automate rating processes and support multiple pricing models. Easily manage recurring subscription billing with automatic renewals.
- For
- companies of every size, from pre-revenue startups to fast-growing businesses
- Price stated
- Users subscribe to NetSuite for an annual license fee. Your license is made up of three main components: core platform, optional modules and the number of users. There is also a one-time implementation fee for initial setup. SuiteBilling is available as an add-on module. netsuite.com/portal/products/erp/financial-management/billing.shtml
- Certifications
- ASC 606IFRS 15
- Customers named
- Chargeback GurusCentralReach
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What NetSuite SuiteBilling's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: netsuite.com/portal/products/erp/financial-management.shtml, netsuite.com/portal/products/erp/financial-management/billing.shtml, netsuite.com/portal/products/erp/financial-management/billing/subscription-metrics.shtml. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NetSuite SuiteBilling's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NetSuite SuiteBilling, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NetSuite SuiteBilling by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where NetSuite SuiteBilling is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name NetSuite SuiteBilling, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.