Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 29% → 26%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
26%from 29% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 2 of 80, unchanged
ProfitWell · 1 category · RankedProfitWell Metrics
117Judge labels
21First choices
28Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
26% in SaaS metrics for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 78 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 42 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ProfitWell Metrics →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 85
26%51 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 78
14%42 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise109 of 109
0%24 labels
criticized challenger
In saas metrics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ProfitWell Metrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 14% | 2 of 78 | 29% | 42 | criticized challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 17% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ProfitWell Metrics held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · SaaS metrics · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 17% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 of 75, unchanged
Enterprise▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 3 → 99 of 99
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS metrics | 17% | 14% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 17% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 78, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ProfitWell Metrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ProfitWell Metrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels1
Paraphrase13 labels1
Comparative29 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained27 labels18
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative24 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative117 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“My top recommendation for a limited budget would be ProfitWell Metrics since it's free with no revenue limits” MiniMax M2.5 · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · first choice
“The best SaaS metrics dashboard for a company with a limited budget is ProfitWell Metrics by Paddle, which is free” Llama 4 Maverick · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually ProfitWell Metrics if your main goal is core SaaS revenue tracking” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want to spend $0: Use ProfitWell for revenue metrics + Looker Studio for visualization” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Bottom line: Avoid if you need real-time data, multi-billing-platform support, or long-term product investment.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Basic ProfitWell (Paddle) setups – assumes a simple sales process and may not scale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative
“ProfitWell Metrics (Stripe-owned, now deprecated)” Grok 4.1 Fast · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · hard negative
“free Metrics updates can take 3\u20136 hours... Check whether that cadence, support, and your data-export needs fit” GPT-6 Luna · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProfitWell Metrics, over the 117 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProfitWell Metrics was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProfitWell Metrics, over the 117 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProfitWell Metrics was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProfitWell Metrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 109 of the 117 answers that named ProfitWell Metrics and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
baremetrics.com97
designrevision.com74
databox.com59
finance-ai-index.com30
cometly.com27
paddle.comYour site24
taskade.com24
chartmogul.com22
saasrise.com22
getfairview.com21
376 of the 400 domain citations in answers naming ProfitWell Metrics came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
paddle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ProfitWell Metrics takes 14% of first choices and ChartMogul takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
paddle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ProfitWell Metrics takes 14% of first choices and ChartMogul takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “saas metrics tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “saas metrics dashboard”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“profitwell metrics”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 172,079 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 13,558 · 1,973 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 18,823
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
14%
rank 2 of 78 in saas metrics
Segment leader
49%
ChartMogul
- First choices
- 21 across its categories
- Named in
- 117 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 109 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on paddle.com
2,201
subdomains included
Content
749
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,029
Product · Integration
16 · 18
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 444 | 16 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Case study | 86 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 80 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 54 | 0 | 2025-11-04 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 30 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 29 | 0 | 2026-04-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 21 | 1 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2023-07-27 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Feature comparison glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-29Pathways glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-22Subscriptions report or ebook
- 2026-09-10Payments in singapore blog
- 2026-09-10Payments in india blog
- 2026-09-10Payments in brazil blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page paddle.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as ProfitWell Metrics
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ProfitWell Metrics; a claim can dispute any of them.
ProfitWell 7ProfitWell Metrics (by Paddle) 4ProfitWell (now Paddle Retain) 3ProfitWell/Paddle 3ProfitWell (by Paddle) 2ProfitWell Metrics (Paddle) 2ProfitWell Metrics by Paddle 2Paddle/ProfitWell Metrics 1ProfitWell (Paddle Metrics) 1ProfitWell (Paddle) 1ProfitWell (now Paddle Metrics) 1ProfitWell Metrics (now Paddle Metrics) 1ProfitWell Metrics (now Paddle Metrics, basic setups) 1ProfitWell Metrics (now part of Paddle) 1ProfitWell Metrics / Paddle 1ProfitWell Metrics / Paddle Metrics 1ProfitWell by Paddle 1Profitwell (now Paddle Metrics) 1
Follow ProfitWell Metrics
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ProfitWell is the company behind ProfitWell Metrics.ShowHide
The company
ProfitWell is the company behind ProfitWell Metrics.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from ProfitWell
- ProfitWell / Paddle, ProfitWell / Paddle Metrics, ProfitWell / Paddle Retain
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProfitWell Metrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProfitWell Metrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ProfitWell Metrics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ProfitWell Metrics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ProfitWell Metrics, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where ProfitWell Metrics is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where ProfitWell Metrics is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideProfitWell Metrics is among the products AI models recommend first in SaaS metrics and analytics this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.