Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 23 of 76, unchanged
Chase · 1 category · Named, not rankedChase Performance Business Checking
5Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Chase Performance Business Checking was named 1 time in Business banking, where Mercury led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business25 of 87
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 86
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise23 of 106
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In business banking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Chase Performance Business Checking for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business banking | Treasury and cash | 2% | 18 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 23% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Chase Performance Business Checking held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Business banking · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 16 of 82, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 of 99, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business banking | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 18 of 86, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Chase Performance Business Checking across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Chase Performance Business Checking across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For a traditional mid-market B2B company, I'd suggest Chase Performance Business Checking if you value in-person relationship banking” Kimi K2 · Business banking · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chase Performance Business Checking, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chase Performance Business Checking was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chase Performance Business Checking, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chase Performance Business Checking was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chase Performance Business Checking. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Chase Performance Business Checking and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
nerdwallet.com4
airwallex.com3
brex.com3
business.bankofamerica.com3
chase.comYour site3
forbes.com3
bookings.hants.gov.uk2
cnbc.com2
investopedia.com2
money.com2
Twenty-four of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Chase Performance Business Checking came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
chase.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chase Performance Business Checking takes 2% of first choices and Mercury takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
chase.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chase Performance Business Checking takes 2% of first choices and Mercury takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “business banking providers”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “business bank account for a company”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- chase.com shared with Chase's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 52,427,131 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 446,616 · 98,455 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 47,384
- Paid Google search
- 58 searches its ads show for, about 3,611 clicks and $69,752 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 86 in business banking
Segment leader
23%
Mercury
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 5 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 5 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Chase Performance Business Checking
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Chase Performance Business Checking; a claim can dispute any of them.
Chase Performance Business Checking® 1
Follow Chase Performance Business Checking
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Chase is the company behind Chase Performance Business Checking.ShowHide
The company
Chase is the company behind Chase Performance Business Checking.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Designed to offer mid-sized businesses more tools and versatility.
- For
- mid-sized businesses
- Price stated
- The Monthly Service Fee can be reduced from $40 to $0. chase.com/business/banking/checking/performance-business-checking
- Starting price
- 40 chase.com/business/banking/checking/performance-business-checking
- Certifications
- FDIC insured up to $250,000Member FDIC
- Customers named
- OSOMTEX
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Chase Performance Business Checking's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: chase.com/business/banking/checking/performance-business-checking, chase.com/business/banking/checking, chase.com/business/offers/business-checking, chase.com/business/banking/open-business-checking, chase.com/business/resources/business-bank-account-information. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chase Performance Business Checking's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chase Performance Business Checking, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chase Performance Business Checking by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Chase Performance Business Checking is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Chase Performance Business Checking, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.