| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate cards | Spend and procurement | 12% | 3 of 67 | 15% | 60 | accepted challenger | ▲+9Since September 2026: 5% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 4% | 6 of 54 | 12% | 34 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business banking | Treasury and cash | 4% | 7 of 86 | 9% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 8% → 5%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 2% | 11 of 54 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 22% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 12 of 46 | 14% | 50 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 12 of 61 | 19% | 21 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 20 of 98 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 0% | 26 of 85 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 38 of 124 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B BNPL and net terms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 51 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Resolve Pay at 56% | |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 53 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate cards | 5% | 13% | ▲+9Since September 2026: 5% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 67, unchanged |
| Expense management | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 6 of 54 |
| Business banking | 8% | 5% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 8% → 5%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 7 of 86 |
| Accounts payable automat | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 11 of 54 |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 12 of 46 |
| Corporate travel managem | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 12 of 61 |
| Business bill pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 20 of 98 |
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 26 of 85 |
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 38 of 124 |
| B2B BNPL and terms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 90, unchanged |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 52 → 53 of 94 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 25 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 19 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 13 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 22 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 11 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 21 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 13 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 18 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I would generally recommend Brex if you want an all-in-one platform for banking, cards, treasury, and spend management” Perplexity Sonar · Business banking · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Airbase and Brex are the top choices” Mistral Small · Corporate cards · direct prompt · first choice
“Ramp, Brex, and Divvy are frequently mentioned by small businesses.” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate cards · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Ramp/Brex if you want modern automation and card-led spend control.” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate cards · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid: - Brex (if you're small, international, or need stable limits — the Trustpilot reviews are brutal)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate cards · negative prompt · hard negative
“Brex (Avoid if you are a bootstrapped or traditional small business)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Expense management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Brex (Avoid if you are a traditional, non-VC-backed small business)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Spend management platfor · negative prompt · hard negative
“Brex has a history of pivoting away from small businesses... introduces long-term uncertainty regarding how underwriting requirements and platform fees will evolve.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate cards · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 640 of the 672 answers that named Brex and are not a share of its labels.
1,763 of the 2,155 domain citations in answers naming Brex came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 125 | 0 | 2026-03-12 | Corporate cards, Expense management | |
| News or press | 80 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| Case study | 61 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 54 | 0 | 2025-04-07 | ||
| Comparison | 35 | 0 | 2026-06-29 | Expense management | |
| Report or ebook | 21 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 0 | 2025-01-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2026-04-16 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-15 |
Every page brex.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Brex's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: brex.com, brex.com/pricing, brex.com/trust, brex.com/product/api, brex.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Brex's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Brex, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Brex by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Brex is among the products AI models recommend first in Corporate cards this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.