Small business▼−5Since September 2026: 16% → 11%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 94
ContractZen
23Judge labels
9First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Entity management for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 81 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ContractZen →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 99
10%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market2 of 81
8%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise52 of 89
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ContractZen for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 8% | 2 of 81 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 13% → 7%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ContractZen held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Entity management · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 13% → 7%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 79
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 44 of 77, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | 13% | 7% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 13% → 7%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 2 of 81 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ContractZen across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ContractZen across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels2
Paraphrase5 labels4
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels2
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ContractZen if you need a broader entity management focus with board, contract, and document workflow in one platform” Perplexity Sonar · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best All-In-One Budget Option ... ContractZen is one of the most cost-effective governance systems on the market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice
“such as Commenda or ContractZen. These software solutions are designed for mid-market organizations and SMBs” Llama 4 Maverick · Entity management · direct prompt · first choice
“ContractZen Advanced is the most commonly referenced affordable all-in-one with a free trial” Muse Glimmer 30B · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“has a 30-day free trial, but the result frames it more around built-in meeting management than low-cost entity management specifically” Perplexity Sonar · Entity management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ContractZen, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContractZen was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ContractZen, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContractZen was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ContractZen. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named ContractZen and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com18
sourceforge.net15
discern.com12
itechguides.com11
capterra.com10
getapp.com9
softwaresuggest.com9
diliforce.com8
softwareadvice.com8
thelegalpractice.com8
No domain is on file for ContractZen, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where ContractZen stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where ContractZen stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“contractzen”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 2 of 81 in entity management
Segment leader
41%
Athennian
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as ContractZen
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ContractZen; a claim can dispute any of them.
ContractZen (Diliforce) 1ContractZen / Diliforce 1Diliforce / ContractZen 1
Follow ContractZen
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ContractZen's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ContractZen, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ContractZen by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ContractZen is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ContractZen, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where ContractZen is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where ContractZen is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideContractZen is among the products AI models recommend first in Entity management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.