Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 11% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 of 94, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedDiliforce
11Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Diliforce was named 5 times in Entity management, where Athennian led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 99
8%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 81
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Diliforce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 2% | 11 of 81 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Diliforce held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Entity management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 24 → 17 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 11 of 81 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Diliforce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Diliforce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ContractZen Advanced is the most commonly referenced affordable all-in-one with a free trial” Muse Glimmer 30B · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice
“Diliforce / ContractZen (Best for Smaller Mid-Market / Budget-Conscious)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · direct prompt · alternative
“Best "All-in-One" Governance Suite ... Diliforce is the best choice” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Diliforce is best for SMBs, startups, and growing organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Diliforce, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diliforce was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Diliforce, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diliforce was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diliforce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Diliforce and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
diliforce.comYour site11
g2.com9
capterra.com6
softwareadvice.com5
teamed.global5
getapp.com4
coverpin.com3
enate.io3
legaltechnologyhub.com3
minutebox.com3
Forty-one of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Diliforce came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
diliforce.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Diliforce takes 2% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
diliforce.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Diliforce takes 2% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “entity management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “legal entity management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“diliforce”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 93 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 144 · 1 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 543
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 video · 1 shown in the last 30 days
First shown August 2026, as Diliforce. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 81 in entity management
Segment leader
41%
Athennian
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on diliforce.com
412
subdomains included
Content
170
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
7 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 85 | 0 | 2026-03-31 | Entity management | |
| News or press | 59 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | Entity management | |
| Case study | 23 | 2 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2026-02-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-08Admicom plc centralizes board work with diliforce case study
- 2026-09-07What is a governance graph glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-05Rapala vmc group selects diliforce as its governance platform news or press
- 2026-08-04How rapala streamlined governance with diliforce case study
- 2026-06-18Contractzen is becoming diliforce news or press
- 2026-03-31A practical guide to board portals for growing companies blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page diliforce.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Diliforce
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Diliforce; a claim can dispute any of them.
ContractZen / Diliforce 1Diliforce (formerly ContractZen) 1Diliforce / ContractZen 1
Follow Diliforce
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Diliforce is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Diliforce is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Board Portal & Contract Management Software
- For
- General Counsels, Legal Teams, CFOs, Finance Teams, CEOs, Business Owners, CIOs, CTOs, Boards of Directors, Investors, Compliance Officers, SMBs, Growth Companies, Enterprises, Non-profits, Startups
- Price stated
- The Standard plan starts at $9.50 per user per month, billed annually. The Advanced plan is $27 per user per month with a 5-user minimum, billed annually. Organizations with more than 50 users can request a tailored Custom plan, and eligible non-profits can contact Diliforce about a discount. diliforce.com
- Starting price
- 9.50 diliforce.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial with no credit card required diliforce.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5 diliforce.com/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27018FedRAMPSOC 1SOC 2EU GDPR
- Hosting
- EU geographyAzure datacenter
- Customers named
- Kiron InteractiveRELEX SolutionsSIGG Switzerland Bottles AGBart CentauroTalentBurst Inc.
What Diliforce's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: diliforce.com, diliforce.com/pricing, diliforce.com/product/smartindex. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diliforce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diliforce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Diliforce by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Diliforce is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Diliforce, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.