Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 25% → 22%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 25% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 of 94, unchanged
1 category · RankedEntityKeeper
103Judge labels
15First choices
14Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
23% in Entity management for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 81 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 40 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of EntityKeeper →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 99
23%41 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 81
6%40 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise21 of 89
0%22 labels
criticized challenger
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named EntityKeeper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 6% | 4 of 81 | 10% | 40 | accepted challenger | ▼−9Since September 2026: 16% → 7%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, EntityKeeper held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Entity management · by segment
Mid-market▼−9Since September 2026: 16% → 7%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 2 → 3 of 79
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 9 → 72 of 77
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | 16% | 7% | ▼−9Since September 2026: 16% → 7%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 4 of 81 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated EntityKeeper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated EntityKeeper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels3
Paraphrase12 labels4
Comparative23 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained21 labels5
Scale-constrained14 labels3
Negative13 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative103 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For the most budget-conscious option, EntityKeeper's free plan is a strong starting point.” Mistral Small · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice
“🥇 Top Pick: EntityKeeper (for Entity Management)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“EntityKeeper is the tool I'd recommend first” MiniMax M2.5 · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“EntityKeeper — Budget-friendly option, strong for stable structures with under 200 entities, published pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“I'd skip EntityKeeper on a tight budget: its published annual plans start at $5,000” GPT-6 Luna · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid giants like EntityKeeper or Diligent unless you are prepared to pay $5,000+/year” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative
“"Legacy/Standalone Entity Databases (e.g., Basic Spreadsheets or Early CRMs like Generic \"EntityKeeper\" for Scale-Up Beyond Small Portfolios)"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Entity management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Problematic for scaling beyond small portfolios, with limitations in historical data reconstruction” Grok 4.1 Fast · Entity management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as EntityKeeper, over the 103 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EntityKeeper was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as EntityKeeper, over the 103 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EntityKeeper was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EntityKeeper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 103 of the 103 answers that named EntityKeeper and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
discern.com63
techbullion.com61
g2.com55
sourceforge.net49
getapp.com47
itechguides.com44
softwaresuggest.com39
worldmetrics.org35
us.fitgap.com34
commenda.io32
459 of the 459 domain citations in answers naming EntityKeeper came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
entitykeeper.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, EntityKeeper takes 6% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
entitykeeper.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, EntityKeeper takes 6% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “entity management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “legal entity management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“entitykeeper”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 617 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 212 · 12 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 186
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 4 of 81 in entity management
Segment leader
41%
Athennian
- First choices
- 15 across its categories
- Named in
- 103 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 103 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on entitykeeper.com
249
subdomains included
Content
168
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 150 | 0 | 2025-06-30 | Entity management | |
| Conference or event | 9 | undated | Entity management | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2025-06-04 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2023-12-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | Entity management | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2022-05-31 | Entity management |
Most recent
- 2025-06-30Entity management software is the one tool your company needs in 2025 and heres why blog
- 2025-06-26Untangling legal entity compliance blog
- 2025-06-19Entity compliance briefing june 2025 blog
- 2025-06-18Compliance briefing stay ahead of whats next for your legal entities blog
- 2025-06-11Centralized entity management for compliance and control blog
- 2025-06-10From siloed to streamlined build a single source of truth for entity management blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page entitykeeper.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as EntityKeeper
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EntityKeeper; a claim can dispute any of them.
EntityKeeper (by Apprio) 1EntityKeeper / MinuteBox 1
Follow EntityKeeper
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
EntityKeeper is its own company.ShowHide
The company
EntityKeeper is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Entity management and compliance software
- For
- Legal, finance and accounting, and operations teams who manage many entities, often inside commercial real estate and investment organizations where accuracy and compliance carry real liability.
- Price stated
- MONTHLY: Corporate $465 /mo; Enterprise $925 /mo; Platinum Custom. YEARLY: Corporate $5,000 /yr; Enterprise $10,000 /yr; Platinum Custom. Full-service EntityKeeper: $50 per entity, per year, excluding state and filing fees. entitykeeper.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 465 /mo entitykeeper.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 5 entitykeeper.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, hosting, customers
What EntityKeeper's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: entitykeeper.com, entitykeeper.com/pricing, entitykeeper.com/tag/compliance, entitykeeper.com/category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EntityKeeper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EntityKeeper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EntityKeeper by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where EntityKeeper is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name EntityKeeper, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.