Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 69 → 80 of 94
CT Corporation · 1 category · RankedCT Corporation Entity Management
37Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Entity management for mid-market buyers
Rank 17 of 81 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CT Corporation Entity Management →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business84 of 99
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market17 of 81
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise12 of 89
0%16 labels
accepted challenger
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CT Corporation Entity Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 0% | 17 of 81 | 18% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CT Corporation Entity Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Entity management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 → 19 of 79
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 17 → 12 of 77
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 17 of 81 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CT Corporation Entity Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CT Corporation Entity Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprise-grade, often bundled with registered agent services; quote-based pricing; strong for multinational compliance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose CSC or CT Corporation if you want to completely outsource the headache of filing state paperwork” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Companies wanting integrated registered agent services with entity management” Kimi K2 · Entity management · comparative prompt · alternative
“commonly recommended for US multi-state compliance and larger multinationals” Muse Glimmer 30B · Entity management · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Higher per-entity costs; less control over internal workflows” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Entity management · scale prompt · soft negative
“service-led and typically more expensive” Kimi K2 · Entity management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CT Corporation Entity Management, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CT Corporation Entity Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CT Corporation Entity Management, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CT Corporation Entity Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CT Corporation Entity Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 37 answers that named CT Corporation Entity Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
discern.com30
techbullion.com23
g2.com20
commenda.io18
sourceforge.net18
getapp.com17
itechguides.com17
softwaresuggest.com16
us.fitgap.com16
parse.gl15
190 of the 190 domain citations in answers naming CT Corporation Entity Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
wolterskluwer.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CT Corporation Entity Management takes 0% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
wolterskluwer.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, CT Corporation Entity Management takes 0% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “entity management tools”
6
Position for “legal entity management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“ct corporation entity management”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,373,906 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 117,664 · 13,778 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 46,626
- Paid Google search
- 19 searches its ads show for, about 1,183 clicks and $15,481 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 81 in entity management
Segment leader
41%
Athennian
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 37 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 36 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as CT Corporation Entity Management
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CT Corporation Entity Management; a claim can dispute any of them.
CT Corporation 6CSC Entity Management / CT Corporation 1CT Corporation (hCue by Wolters Kluwer) 1CT Corporation (hCue) 1CT Corporation / CSC Global 1
Follow CT Corporation Entity Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CT Corporation is the company behind CT Corporation Entity Management.ShowHide
The company
CT Corporation is the company behind CT Corporation Entity Management.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Work with a leader in business compliance solutions and entity management. Rely on our experts to support your business throughout its life cycle.
- For
- financial institutions, corporations, small and midsize businesses, and law firms
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What CT Corporation Entity Management's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: wolterskluwer.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CT Corporation Entity Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CT Corporation Entity Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CT Corporation Entity Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CT Corporation Entity Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CT Corporation Entity Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.