AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Harbor Compliance · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Harbor Compliance

16Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Harbor Compliance was named 8 times in Entity management, where Athennian led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Harbor Compliance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Entity managementEquity and corporate0%53 of 8138%8under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Harbor Compliance held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Entity management · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 29 of 94
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 57 of 79

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Entity management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 20 → 53 of 81

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Harbor Compliance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200112
GLM 4.7 FlashX00112
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your main need is state-compliance reminders, look at Harbor Compliance instead.” GPT-6 Luna · Entity management · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for: Multi-state filings and annual report automation” MiniMax M2.5 · Entity management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“à la carte pricing model charges separately for entity management, licensing tracking, and compliance services, creating costs that accumulate” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Entity management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Higher per-entity costs; less control over internal workflows” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Entity management · scale prompt · soft negative
“service-led and typically more expensive” Kimi K2 · Entity management · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Harbor Compliance, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Harbor Compliance was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Athennian12 of 163Not among the top eight
EntityKeeper12 of 163Not among the top eight
Diligent Entities11 of 163Not among the top eight
CSC Entity Management11 of 161Not among the top eight
CT Corporation Entity Management10 of 160Not among the top eight
Filejet9 of 163Not among the top eight
MinuteBox6 of 160Not among the top eight
Discern5 of 160Not among the top eight
Cogency Global3 of 160Not among the top eight
Computershare GEMS3 of 160Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Harbor Compliance. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Harbor Compliance and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

harborcompliance.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Harbor Compliance takes 0% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “entity management tools”
8
Position for “legal entity management software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“harbor compliance”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
71 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 259,483 a month
Searches its site ranks for
44,595 · 2,509 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,380
Paid Google search
9 searches its ads show for, about 45 clicks and $715 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
84 ads · 80 text, 3 image, 1 video · 62 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2024, as Harbor Business Compliance Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 69 in the year, 15 before. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 53 of 81 in entity management
Segment leader
41%
Athennian
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
16 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on harborcompliance.com
3,103
subdomains included
Content
1,968
counted in the table below
Documentation
134
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,94072026-09-08
Glossary or explainer13undated
Comparison11undated
Webinar or virtual event202024-10-31
Template or tool2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page harborcompliance.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Harbor Compliance

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Harbor Compliance is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
State Licensing Compliance Platform
For
multistate organizations; business or nonprofit with operations in more than one state
Price stated
Texas Registered Agent service in Austin. $99/year, no hidden fees. harborcompliance.com
Free plan or trial
FREE Harbor Compliance Score™ harborcompliance.com
Hosting
all 50 statesWashington D.C.Puerto Ricoselect Canadian provincesUnited States
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, customers

What Harbor Compliance's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: harborcompliance.com, harborcompliance.com/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Harbor Compliance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Harbor Compliance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Harbor Compliance by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Harbor Compliance is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Harbor Compliance, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at harborcompliance.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.