Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 96 → 100 of 103
Qlik · 1 category · RankedQlik Sense
38Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Financial reporting for mid-market buyers
Rank 25 of 105 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Qlik Sense →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business102 of 105
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 105
0%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise19 of 109
0%19 labels
accepted challenger
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Qlik Sense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 25 of 105 | 20% | 15 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Qlik Sense held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial reporting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 21 → 25 of 102
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 → 17 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 25 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Qlik Sense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Qlik Sense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative23 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need to explore data relationships, Qlik Sense is your best bet.” Mistral Small · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Complex, exploratory data analysis or deployment flexibility: Qlik” GPT-6 Luna · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Qlik offers flexible exploration for complex data environments.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“A powerhouse for complex, associative data discovery.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“While powerful for data discovery, many users report: Difficult and costly transition periods... Data refresh issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative
“dashboard tools like Power BI, Tableau, and Qlik may not have the necessary reporting features” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Causes "suffering" for some due to usability.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Qlik Sense, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qlik Sense was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Qlik Sense, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qlik Sense was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qlik Sense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 38 answers that named Qlik Sense and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
kanerika.com14
worldmetrics.org14
qlik.comYour site13
domo.com11
fanruan.com11
medium.com11
gitnux.org10
coefficient.io9
improvado.io9
linkedin.com9
Ninety-eight of the 111 domain citations in answers naming Qlik Sense came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
qlik.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Qlik Sense takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
qlik.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Qlik Sense takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “reporting tools”
3
Position for “financial reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“qlik sense”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 379 a month
- Its company's site
- qlik.com shared with Qlik's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 705,831 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,174 · 2,359 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 23,472
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 105 in financial reporting
Segment leader
33%
Sage Intacct
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 38 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Qlik Sense
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Qlik Sense; a claim can dispute any of them.
Qlik 5Qlik (Sense/View) 1Qlik Cloud Analytics / Qlik Sense 1
Follow Qlik Sense
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Qlik is the company behind Qlik Sense.ShowHide
The company
Qlik is the company behind Qlik Sense.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Qlik
- Qlik Cloud Analytics / Qlik Sense, Qlik Talend
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Dashboard Demo Videos; Explore information and quickly gain insights; Watch free demo videos to see modern, interactive dashboards in action
- For
- global enterprises
- Free plan or trial
- free demo qlik.com/us/lp/sem/demo/qlik-sense-business-intelligence
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Qlik Sense's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: qlik.com/us/demo/qlik-sense-dashboards, qlik.com/us/lp/sem/demo/qlik-sense-business-intelligence, qlik.com/us/lp/sem/demo/qlik-sense-trial-business-intelligence, community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Reporting-Tool-Qlik-Sense/td-p/117391, community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Answers/Comandos-usados-no-Qlik-Senser/td-p/2511899. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qlik Sense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qlik Sense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Qlik Sense by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Qlik Sense is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Qlik Sense, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.