AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › FIS · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

FIS

36Judge labels
0First choices
12Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FIS was named 5 times in Treasury management syst and 1 other category, where Trovata led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FIS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Treasury management systemsTreasury and cash0%45 of 12425%4under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
B2B payment acceptanceReceivables and billing0%55 of 940%1under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19%goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

Since September 2026, FIS held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 121 → 103 of 109
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 39 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 17 → 19 of 82

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Treasury management syst0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 20 → 45 of 124
B2B payment acceptance0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 42 → 55 of 94

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated FIS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative7 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“known for its institutional scale and is often chosen by corporate finance teams that require daily cash and payments reconciliation” Mistral Small · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
“Pick FIS if AI-assisted forecasting and automation are central.” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Older/On-Premises or Legacy Systems (e.g., some FIS or ERP-integrated modules)... Prolonged setups (9–18 months), poor API connectivity” Grok 4.1 Fast · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FIS, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FIS was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Kyriba23 of 3613Not among the top eight
HighRadius16 of 361Not among the top eight
SAP Treasury and Risk Management12 of 360Not among the top eight
Trovata11 of 364Not among the top eight
ION Treasury11 of 360Not among the top eight
GTreasury7 of 361Not among the top eight
Agicap6 of 362Not among the top eight
Adyen6 of 361Not among the top eight
Tipalti5 of 362Not among the top eight
Stripe5 of 360Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FIS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 36 answers that named FIS and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

fisglobal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FIS takes 0% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “treasury management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “treasury management systems”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
49,500 a month (“fis”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
303,815 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 175,497 a month
Searches its site ranks for
9,053 · 990 in the top three
Sites linking to it
11,973
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
45 ads · 28 text, 15 image, 2 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as Fidelity Information Services, LLC, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 45 of 124 in treasury management syst
Segment leader
28%
Trovata
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
36 answers
Its own site cited
in 34 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on fisglobal.com
1,871
subdomains included
Content
732
counted in the table below
Documentation
11
Product · Integration
184 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press304undated
Blog30302026-06-03
Webinar or virtual event4802026-05-26
Conference or event3432026-10-01
Report or ebook2902024-07-08
Podcast or video12undated
Comparison2undated

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on fisglobal.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fisglobal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as FIS

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FIS; a claim can dispute any of them.
FIS (FIS Integrity) 1

Follow FIS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

FIS is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
fintech for bold ideas
For
merchants, banks, and capital markets firms globally
Customers named
Avidia BankPrimeSouth Bank
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What FIS's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: fisglobal.com, fisglobal.com/products/epic, fisglobal.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FIS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FIS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FIS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where FIS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name FIS, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fisglobal.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.