Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 16 of 106, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedFonoa
10Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fonoa was named 5 times in Global e-invoicing compl and 1 other category, where Avalara E-Invoicing led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 114
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market43 of 136
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Fonoa for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 43 of 136 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales tax automation | Tax and compliance | 0% | 22 of 37 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara AvaTax at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Fonoa held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 38 → 86 of 116
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 43 of 136 |
| Sales tax automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 22 of 37 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Fonoa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Fonoa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best overall: Unified AI tax infrastructure with one data model spanning the entire indirect tax lifecycle” Muse Glimmer 30B · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best API-First Solution for Tech-Forward B2B Companies... Fonoa is an exceptional option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Global digital companies may lean toward Fonoa or Anrok for modern VAT compliance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales tax automation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Fonoa reviews note that cost can become quite high because pricing is usage-based” GPT-5.4 mini · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fonoa, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fonoa was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fonoa, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fonoa was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fonoa. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Fonoa and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
avalara.com7
guideflow.com4
worldmetrics.org4
ciopages.com3
commenda.io3
g2.com3
sourceforge.net3
anrok.com2
gitnux.org2
itechguides.com2
Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Fonoa came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on fonoa.com
734
subdomains included
Content
650
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
13 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 558 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 26 | 0 | 2024-04-26 | ||
| Report or ebook | 18 | 2 | 2026-08-24 | Global e-invoicing compl | |
| Case study | 14 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 13 | 0 | 2024-04-23 | ||
| News or press | 10 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | 1 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-06-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Netherlands mandatory b2b e invoicing digital reporting blog
- 2026-09-21Primary source tax law citation audit blog
- 2026-09-16Indirect tax regulatory change monitoring blog
- 2026-09-11Spain b2b e invoicing blog
- 2026-09-08Slovakia efaktura infrastructure e invoicing blog
- 2026-09-01Brazil digital platform e invoicing mandate blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fonoa.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Fonoa
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Fonoa is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Fonoa is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI platform for global indirect tax
- For
- e-businesses managing indirect taxes
- Price stated
- Custom enterprise pricing available on request. fonoa.com/platform/audit
- Certifications
- accredited government connections
- Customers named
- CodaWelo GlobalFinBooking.com TransportWellhubApaleoLimehomeRemote
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Fonoa's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: fonoa.com, trust.fonoa.com, fonoa.com/platform/audit, fonoa.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fonoa's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fonoa, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fonoa by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Fonoa is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fonoa, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.