| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales tax automation | Tax and compliance | 6% | 5 of 37 | 0% | 21 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 7% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 2% | 14 of 136 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Merchants of record | Receivables and billing | 2% | 11 of 45 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Paddle at 28% | |
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 0% | 60 of 81 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merchants of record | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 11 of 45, unchanged |
| Sales tax automation | 7% | 7% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 7% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 5 of 37 |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 14 of 136 |
| Entity management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 81, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Anrok — *Best overall for B2B SaaS and Digital Subscriptions*... Anrok is the market leader.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“or Anrok if you prefer to keep your payment stack flexible while getting modern tax automation” Kimi K2 · Merchants of record · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you're SaaS or subscription-based → Anrok (purpose-built for your model)” Kimi K2 · Sales tax automation · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for B2B SaaS and Software Companies: Anrok or Numeral” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales tax automation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“do not handle the full entity lifecycle” Mistral Small · Entity management · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 66 answers that named Anrok and are not a share of its labels.
266 of the 290 domain citations in answers naming Anrok came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 184 | undated | Sales tax automation, Revenue recognition | ||
| Template or tool | 58 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 37 | undated | Sales tax automation | ||
| Case study | 26 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 11 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated |
Every page anrok.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Anrok's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: anrok.com, anrok.com/pricing, anrok.com/security, anrok.com/product/ai-atlas, anrok.com/type/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Anrok's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Anrok, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Anrok by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: