AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Harvest · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Harvest

15Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Harvest was named 2 times in Invoicing software, where Zoho Invoice led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In invoicing software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Harvest for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Invoicing softwareReceivables and billing0%22 of 710%2under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Harvest held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Invoicing software · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 → 9 of 46
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 66 → 20 of 65
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 81 of 96, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Invoicing software0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 66 → 22 of 71

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Harvest across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Harvest simplifies invoicing and project management for small teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Invoicing software · budget prompt · alternative
“The gold standard for turning tracked hours into invoices” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Invoicing software · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Harvest, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Harvest was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zoho Invoice7 of 153Not among the top eight
FreshBooks7 of 151Not among the top eight
Wave7 of 151Not among the top eight
Square Invoices7 of 150Not among the top eight
Xero6 of 152Not among the top eight
QuickBooks6 of 151Not among the top eight
Stripe Invoicing4 of 150Not among the top eight
BILL3 of 150Not among the top eight
Invoice Ninja3 of 150Not among the top eight
BigTime2 of 152Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Harvest. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named Harvest and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

getharvest.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Harvest takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Invoice takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “invoicing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “invoicing software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
135,000 a month (“harvest”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
89,364 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 711,234 a month
Searches its site ranks for
23,919 · 946 in the top three
Sites linking to it
8,311
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
117+ ads · 115 text, 1 image, 1 video · 46 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Bending Spoons Operations S.p.A, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 21 in the year, 96 before. 3 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 71 in invoicing software
Segment leader
24%
Zoho Invoice
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 14 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on getharvest.com
30,473
subdomains included
Content
2,347
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
3 · 71
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Template or tool1,37401970-01-01
Blog81402024-08-12
Glossary or explainer6702024-11-23
Comparison5401970-01-01
Case study27undated
Webinar or virtual event502011-01-01
Report or ebook401970-01-01
Conference or event202011-12-01

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page getharvest.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Harvest

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Harvest is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Time tracking and management software with powerful easy reporting and streamlined online invoicing.
For
professional teams
Price stated
Free 30-day trial getharvest.com
Starting price
$0forever getharvest.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free 30-day trial getharvest.com
Integrations claimed
40 getharvest.com · 50 getharvest.com/pricing pages disagree
Customers named
FARRYNHEIGHTPublicLuminary LabsJ&O LawNetalicoSocial RevoltRanaCentric Digital
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting

What Harvest's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: getharvest.com, getharvest.com/pricing, trust.getharvest.com, getharvest.com/features/reports-and-analysis, getharvest.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Harvest's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Harvest, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Harvest by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Harvest is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Harvest, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at getharvest.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.