| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 6% | 7 of 83 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Chargeback management | Receivables and billing | 2% | 13 of 81 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24% | |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 2% | 13 of 79 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 31 of 108 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Chaser at 16% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | 2% | 7% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 7 of 83 |
| Accounts receivable auto | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 13 of 79 |
| B2B credit management | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 31 of 108 |
| Chargeback management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 13 of 81, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for mid-market AR operations needing visibility... Ideal for: Mid-sized companies focused on improving payment recovery and dispute visibility” Muse Glimmer 30B · Chargeback management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Kolleno if you want the best balance of automation, SMB fit, and likely lower implementation complexity” Perplexity Sonar · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice
“Upflow / Kolleno / Gaviti: Highly nimble, modern, and built specifically for scaling B2B mid-market companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · scale prompt · first choice
“Kolleno and Gaviti are both excellent choices, with Kolleno offering a modern, scalable solution” Mistral Small · Accounts receivable auto · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“enterprise tools like Chaser and Kolleno charge high monthly fees (often $500+)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · B2B credit management · budget prompt · soft negative
“Solid but narrower scope; less portal collaboration” Grok 4.1 Fast · Chargeback management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 90 of the 91 answers that named Kolleno and are not a share of its labels.
319 of the 354 domain citations in answers naming Kolleno came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 524 | 0 | 2026-02-23 | Cash application, Accounts receivable auto | |
| Glossary or explainer | 43 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | Cash application, Accounts receivable auto | |
| Comparison | 36 | 0 | 2025-12-28 | Cash application | |
| Case study | 31 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2025-02-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2024-10-16 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-23 |
Every page kolleno.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Kolleno's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: kolleno.com, kolleno.com/pricing, kolleno.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kolleno's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kolleno, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kolleno by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: