Small business▼−11Since September 2026: 39% → 28%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
28%from 39% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 1 of 81, unchanged
7 categories · RankedChaser
225Judge labels
40First choices
21Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
27% in B2B credit management for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 108 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 33 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Chaser →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 86
27%44 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 108
16%33 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise79 of 80
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Chaser for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 16% | 1 of 108 | 9% | 33 | accepted challenger | ▲+9Since September 2026: 10% → 19%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 8% | 4 of 101 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 2% | 10 of 79 | 4% | 27 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 2% | 13 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 29 of 83 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 22 of 94 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 33 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Chaser held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · B2B credit management · by segment
Mid-market▲+9Since September 2026: 10% → 19%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
19%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 3 → 1 of 97
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 54 → 74 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | 10% | 19% | ▲+9Since September 2026: 10% → 19%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 1 of 108 |
| Invoicing software | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 33 of 71 |
| Accounts payable automat | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 13 of 54, unchanged |
| Accounts receivable auto | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 10 of 79 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 8% | 9% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 of 101, unchanged |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 29 of 83 |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 22 of 94 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Chaser across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Chaser across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct53 labels12
Paraphrase52 labels15
Comparative42 labels11not counted in share
Budget-constrained46 labels11
Scale-constrained21 labels2
Negative11 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative225 labels in all, every segment counted; 40 of the 55 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Top Pick: Chaser ... For most small-budget B2B companies, Chaser offers the best balance of features, affordability, and ease of use.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B credit management · budget prompt · first choice
“the best B2B credit management option in the results is Chaser because it is described as having transparent, tiered pricing” Perplexity Sonar · B2B credit management · budget prompt · first choice
“Chaser - Best for mid-market finance teams that want customer-facing invoice portals and collections automation in one product.” Llama 4 Maverick · B2B credit management · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Chaser as a top cash management tool. It's specifically built for mid-market B2B finance teams” Mistral Small · Cash flow forecasting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget Chaser is an excellent platform but starts at £199/month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B credit management · budget prompt · hard negative
“specialist tool like Chaser or Upflow—but those typically start at $75–150/month, which may exceed a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · budget prompt · soft negative
“crossing the £4M revenue threshold automatically bumps you to their £599/month tier” Gemini 3.5 Flash · B2B credit management · budget prompt · soft negative
“enterprise tools like Chaser and Kolleno charge high monthly fees (often $500+)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · B2B credit management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chaser, over the 225 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chaser was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chaser, over the 225 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chaser was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chaser. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 218 of the 225 answers that named Chaser and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
chaserhq.comYour site173
g2.com94
highradius.com84
upflow.io81
worldmetrics.org64
guideflow.com58
tesorio.com58
paidnice.com50
gitnux.org49
resolvepay.com49
587 of the 760 domain citations in answers naming Chaser came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Chaser stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Chaser stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “credit management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b credit management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 6,120,000 a month (“chaser”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13,683 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,066 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,306 · 74 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,564
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 1 of 108 in B2B credit management
First choices
40
across its categories
- Named in
- 225 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 218 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on chaserhq.com
766
subdomains included
Content
486
counted in the table below
Documentation
145
Product · Integration
21 · 21
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 442 | 17 | 2026-09-16 | Cash flow forecasting, Accounts receivable auto | |
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 0 | 2025-08-01 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 3 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2024-10-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2025-03-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2024-09-04 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Cash flow isnt just a finance problem its a business habit blog
- 2026-09-16Accounts receivable insights video proactiveness pays blog
- 2026-09-11Accountsiq cash flow forecast blog
- 2026-09-08Top 6 tips to prepare for odoo experience brussels blog
- 2026-09-08Accounts receivable portal blog
- 2026-09-04Best accounts receivable software blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page chaserhq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Chaser
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Chaser is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Chaser is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A global accounts receivable automation platform that helps businesses get paid faster.
- For
- Businesses
- Price stated
- To qualify for the free month, new customers must escalate a minimum number of invoices during the 14-day free trial and first 30-days of subscription. chaserhq.com/en-gb/pricing/collections-offer-terms
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial chaserhq.com
- Certifications
- Soc 2 Type II certifiedSOC 2 type IIISO/IEC 27001:2013
- Customers named
- DocuflowFHCLove BrandsValued AccountancyCommunity Energy SchemeTaxAssistGlaze DigitalHuttie Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Chaser's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: chaserhq.com, chaserhq.com/en-gb/pricing/collections-offer-terms, chaserhq.com/security, chaserhq.com/features/sms, chaserhq.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chaser's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chaser, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chaser by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Chaser is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Chaser, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Chaser is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Chaser is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Chaser first in B2B credit management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.