Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 17 of 106, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedLappa
5Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lappa was named 3 times in Global e-invoicing compl, where Avalara E-Invoicing led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business20 of 114
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 136
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise35 of 90
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lappa for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 2% | 15 of 136 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lappa held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 15 of 116, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 35 of 87, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 15 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lappa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lappa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Top Recommendation: Lappa” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“High ratings (4.9/5 on G2) for multi-country automated filing.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lappa, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lappa was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lappa, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lappa was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lappa. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Lappa and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
avalara.com4
commenda.io3
g2.com3
lappa.orgYour site3
learn.g2.com3
sourceforge.net3
tax.thomsonreuters.com2
apps.shopify.com1
comparatif-pro.com1
dclouds.in1
Twenty-one of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Lappa came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lappa.org
410
subdomains included
Content
213
counted in the table below
Documentation
66
Product · Integration
0 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 108 | 57 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Blog | 92 | 29 | 2026-09-24 | Global e-invoicing compl, Invoicing software | |
| News or press | 8 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 2 | 2026-08-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Epr for non eu manufacturers selling directly to eu customers blog
- 2026-09-22Newsletter september 2026 news or press
- 2026-09-18How to manage packaging epr across multiple eu countries blog
- 2026-09-17Epr reporting after registration what when and how businesses must report blog
- 2026-09-10Who is responsible for packaging epr under ddp dap and exw incoterms blog
- 2026-09-09Request fee quote for ppwr compliance blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lappa.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Lappa
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lappa is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Lappa is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- EPR Reporting Software & Tax Compliance Platform
- For
- for cross-border company sales
- Free plan or trial
- Start your free 14-day trial. No payment card needed. lappa.org
- Integrations claimed
- 25 lappa.org
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, certifications, hosting, customers
What Lappa's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: lappa.org, lappa.org/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lappa's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lappa, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lappa by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lappa is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lappa, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.