Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 → 6 of 32
3 categories · RankedZamp
32Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Sales tax automation for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 37 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 33
4%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 37
2%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 46
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In sales tax automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Zamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales tax automation | Tax and compliance | 2% | 8 of 37 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara AvaTax at 32% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Merchants of record | Receivables and billing | 2% | 12 of 45 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Paddle at 28% | |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 110 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Zamp held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Sales tax automation · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 9 → 8 of 36
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 3 → 9 of 44
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales tax automation | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 8 of 37 |
| Merchants of record | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 45, unchanged |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 110 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Zamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Zamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels5
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Zamp as your primary choice if you want compliance fully handled” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales tax automation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, Zamp is generally the strongest choice” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Merchants of record · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Zamp/TaxCloud rivals with better support claims\u2014but demo and trial first” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales tax automation · negative prompt · alternative
“Taxwire and Zamp act as hybrid "software + managed service" models.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales tax automation · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Zamp, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zamp was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Zamp, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zamp was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Zamp and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
zamp.comYour site26
taxcloud.com19
taxwire.com18
galvix.com17
guideflow.com14
g2.com13
learn.g2.com13
taxjar.com13
avalara.com11
commenda.io11
129 of the 155 domain citations in answers naming Zamp came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
zamp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Zamp takes 2% of first choices and Avalara AvaTax takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
zamp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Zamp takes 2% of first choices and Avalara AvaTax takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales tax tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sales tax compliance software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“zamp”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 262 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 24,260 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,616 · 145 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 848
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 10 clicks and $588 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 37 in sales tax automation
Segment leader
32%
Avalara AvaTax
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 32 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 32 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on zamp.com
4,536
subdomains included
Content
4,410
counted in the table below
Documentation
43
Product · Integration
13 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 3,982 | 0 | 2026-05-14 | ||
| Blog | 268 | 12 | 2026-09-18 | Sales tax automation | |
| Report or ebook | 74 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 48 | 1 | 2026-07-08 | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 11 | undated | |||
| News or press | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-01-06 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18Taxjar pricing blog
- 2026-09-17Avalara pricing blog
- 2026-09-02Audit watch what saas companies need to know about the spike in sales tax scrutiny blog
- 2026-08-19Best sales tax software and how to choose blog
- 2026-08-19Introducing exemption certificate management built in not bolted on blog
- 2026-08-11Ecommerce sales tax software comparison guide blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 26, 2026 to October 27, 2026Relax and unwind at the Zamp Oasis — SuiteWorld 2026poolside at Ceasar's Palace, Las Vegas · hosts
As the event pages on zamp.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page zamp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Zamp
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zamp; a claim can dispute any of them.
Taxwire/Zamp 1
Follow Zamp
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Zamp is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Zamp is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sales tax compliance software, fully managed.
- For
- Businesses selling across the U.S. and Canada
- Price stated
- Simple price, no surprises. zamp.com
- Free plan or trial
- Zamp’s Free API Trial zamp.com
- Integrations claimed
- 10 zamp.com
- Certifications
- SOC2AICPA SOC2
- Customers named
- HandwryttenDavidPuzzleMoonbrewTushyMatthew RehurekThe Hedgehog CompanyLeft On Friday
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What Zamp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zamp.com, zamp.com/pricing, trust.zamp.com, zamp.com/solutions/services, zamp.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zamp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Zamp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zamp, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.