Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 → 20 of 59
1 category · Named, not rankedLeasecake
13Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Leasecake was named 3 times in Lease accounting, where FinQuery led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business23 of 67
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 71
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise66 of 70
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Leasecake for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 2% | 15 of 71 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 29% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Leasecake held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Lease accounting · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 18 → 14 of 64
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 55 of 65, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 15 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Leasecake across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Leasecake across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“1. Leasecake - Offers an easy-to-use user interface that helps mid to large-sized companies navigate high data volumes fast.” Llama 4 Maverick · Lease accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“Designed with a massive emphasis on ease of use and rapid implementation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · scale prompt · alternative
“small portfolios may find Leasecake sufficient” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Leasecake, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leasecake was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Leasecake, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leasecake was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leasecake. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Leasecake and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
softwareconnect.com12
debtbook.com9
capterra.com7
g2.com7
prophix.com7
finquery.com6
gitnux.org6
occupier.com6
acquisition-international.com5
finantrix.com5
Seventy of the seventy domain citations in answers naming Leasecake came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
leasecake.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leasecake takes 2% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
leasecake.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leasecake takes 2% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lease accounting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “lease accounting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“leasecake”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,930 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 772 · 31 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 905
- Paid Google search
- 4 searches its ads show for, about 90 clicks and $1,341 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 71 in lease accounting
Segment leader
29%
FinQuery
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on leasecake.com
163
subdomains included
Content
70
counted in the table below
Documentation
45
Product · Integration
12 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 33 | 33 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 19 | 19 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 11 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 6 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Customer stories case study
- 2026-09-24Underusing ai cons thank you blog
- 2026-09-24Heavy customization cons thank you blog
- 2026-09-24Ignoring ease of use cons thank you blog
- 2026-09-24Abstraction calendar mql thank you blog
- 2026-09-24Demo calendar mql thank you blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page leasecake.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Leasecake
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Leasecake is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Leasecake is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Modern lease management and accounting software built for multi-unit operators.
- For
- multi-unit operators
- Price stated
- Ask Us About Pricing leasecake.com
- Free plan or trial
- Get a 24-point lease audit leasecake.com
- Customers named
- Franklin StreetTropical Smoothie CafeDave's Hot ChickenMB2 DentalServe Hospitality GroupCapriotti's Sandwich ShopAmplifonDunkin’ Franchisee
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Leasecake's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: leasecake.com, leasecake.com/pricing, leasecake.com/solutions/small, leasecake.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leasecake's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leasecake, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Leasecake by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Leasecake is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Leasecake, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.