Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 17 → 7 of 59
1 category · RankedLeaseCrunch
24Judge labels
4First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Lease accounting for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LeaseCrunch →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 67
4%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 71
4%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise69 of 70
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LeaseCrunch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 4% | 9 of 71 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LeaseCrunch held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Lease accounting · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 64
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 → 63 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 9 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LeaseCrunch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LeaseCrunch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase9 labels2
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Top pick – LeaseCrunch ... delivers the right balance of compliance power, ease of integration, and cost predictability.” MiniMax M2.5 · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, LeaseCrunch (Crunchafi) is currently the best-balanced choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“LeaseCrunch – leader in buyer-guide evaluations, SOC 1 Type 2 certified, CPA-firm collaboration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“LeaseCrunch — Strong for calculation accuracy and audit readiness” Kimi K2 · Lease accounting · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LeaseCrunch, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeaseCrunch was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LeaseCrunch, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeaseCrunch was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeaseCrunch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 24 answers that named LeaseCrunch and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
finantrix.com15
finquery.com13
debtbook.com12
softwareconnect.com10
accruent.com9
erpresearch.com9
getapp.com9
occupier.com9
prophix.com9
capterra.com8
103 of the 103 domain citations in answers naming LeaseCrunch came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
crunchafi.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LeaseCrunch takes 4% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
crunchafi.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LeaseCrunch takes 4% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lease accounting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “lease accounting software”
8
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“leasecrunch”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,969 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,408 · 82 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 784
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 71 in lease accounting
Segment leader
29%
FinQuery
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on crunchafi.com
935
subdomains included
Content
655
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
12 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 392 | 4 | 2026-09-21 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| News or press | 124 | 2 | 2026-09-16 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 69 | 6 | 2026-09-24 | Lease accounting | |
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 0 | 2025-09-24 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Comparison | 13 | 0 | 2026-04-29 | Lease accounting | |
| Case study | 12 | 0 | 2025-08-22 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Report or ebook | 11 | 3 | 2026-07-17 | Lease accounting | |
| Template or tool | 10 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2024-07-12 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2022-12-05 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Frs 102 section 20 by the numbers webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-21Ma due diligence software blog
- 2026-09-16Crunchafi bucs analytics acquisition news or press
- 2026-09-14Audit ready financial data blog
- 2026-09-01Improving efficiency in the m a process blog
- 2026-08-18Leases in the audit workflow webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page crunchafi.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as LeaseCrunch
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LeaseCrunch; a claim can dispute any of them.
LeaseCrunch (now Crunchafi) 2LeaseCrunch / Crunchafi 1
Follow LeaseCrunch
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeaseCrunch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeaseCrunch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LeaseCrunch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LeaseCrunch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LeaseCrunch, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.