Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 65 of 158, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedLever
4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lever was named 2 times in Strategic sourcing, where oboloo led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business70 of 166
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market54 of 128
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise42 of 77
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lever for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 54 of 128 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lever held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 90 → 77 of 120
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 35 of 63, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 90 → 54 of 128 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lever across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lever across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lever, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lever was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lever, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lever was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lever. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Lever and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
lever.coYour site3
guideflow.com2
leonar.app2
pin.com2
spendflo.com2
100hires.com1
aihr.com1
aitoolsbakery.com1
auravms.com1
business.amazon.com1
Thirteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Lever came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lever.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lever takes 0% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lever.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lever takes 0% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “strategic sourcing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 60,500 a month (“lever”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 24,663 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 189,552 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 20,989 · 1,917 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 25,675
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 17 clicks and $657 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 54 of 128 in strategic sourcing
Segment leader
15%
oboloo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 4 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lever.co
662
subdomains included
Content
375
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 328 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | Strategic sourcing | |
| Case study | 24 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Comparison | 19 | 6 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2023-01-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09Ai candidate screening blog
- 2026-09-08Ai resume screening blog
- 2026-08-26Best lever alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-24Best icims alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-14Best linkedin recruiter alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-13Bots vs bots what happens when candidates and employers both use ai comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lever.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Lever
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lever is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Lever is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Modern recruiting software that combines ATS and CRM capabilities to help scaling teams nurture talent relationships and hire efficiently.
- For
- small, mid-sized and enterprise organizations that need to scale hiring efficiently
- Price stated
- Lever offers customized pricing based on your company size, hiring volume, feature needs, and implementation requirements. Pricing varies depending on the products, integrations, and support level selected. To receive pricing tailored to your organization, request a demo with Lever. lever.co
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II certifiedSOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001
- Hosting
- US-West2EU-Central1
- Customers named
- NextGen Federal SystemsEnablecompBisnowEmma Sleep GmbHTalendLucidworksRoyal AmbulanceDREAM Charter Schools
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Lever's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lever.co, lever.co/pricing, lever.co/security, lever.co/solutions/dei, lever.co/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lever's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lever, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lever by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lever is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lever, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.