Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 151 of 158, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedBeamery
6Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Beamery was named 2 times in Strategic sourcing, where oboloo led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business158 of 166
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market47 of 128
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 77
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Beamery for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 47 of 128 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Beamery held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 43 of 120, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 49 → 31 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Beamery across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Beamery across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Beamery, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beamery was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Beamery, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beamery was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Beamery. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Beamery and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pin.com4
business.amazon.com2
elementum.ai2
hirebasis.com2
hiretruffle.com2
juicebox.ai2
kalent.ai2
leonar.app2
matchr.io2
salary.com2
Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Beamery came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
beamery.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Beamery takes 0% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
beamery.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Beamery takes 0% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “strategic sourcing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“beamery”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 21 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,866 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,789 · 48 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,794
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 47 of 128 in strategic sourcing
Segment leader
15%
oboloo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 6 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 6 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on beamery.com
537
subdomains included
Content
290
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 224 | 4 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 23 | 0 | 2025-10-06 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 18 | 0 | 2025-12-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2025-10-14 | ||
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2023-08-22 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2025-10-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2025-07-30 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Seeing the work not just the workforce notes from our latest hr leaders roundtable blog
- 2026-09-25From jobs to skills insights from our executive breakfast blog
- 2026-09-25Seeing the work not just the workforce notes from our latest hr leaders roundtable blog
- 2026-09-25From jobs to skills insights from our executive breakfast blog
- 2026-02-02Capacity ghosts why the billion dollar ai pivot dies in human silos blog
- 2026-01-27The invisible ledger governing human capital in the age of ai blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page beamery.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Beamery
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Beamery is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Beamery is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered Workforce Transformation Platform
- For
- Enterprises
- Customers named
- SalesforceFlexHiltiWells FargoEisnerAmper
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Beamery's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: beamery.com, trust.beamery.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Beamery's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Beamery, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Beamery by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Beamery is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Beamery, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.