| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 3% | 12 of 77 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Excel at 14% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 33 of 101 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 41 of 74 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial modeling | 2% | 4% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 12 of 77 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 33 of 101 |
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 74, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“LivePlan and Fathom are often the easiest starting points. They are easier to set up, more affordable” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Financial modeling · budget prompt · first choice
“LivePlan is the gold standard for budget-conscious companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial modeling · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need deeper "what-if" scenarios, try LivePlan (for growth planning)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Small Businesses (Business Planning Focus): LivePlan” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial modeling · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 33 answers that named LivePlan and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy-seven of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming LivePlan came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 654 | 48 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 40 | 0 | 2025-04-23 | ||
| Case study | 37 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 26 | 5 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 12 | 1 | 2026-07-29 | ||
| Podcast or video | 11 | 0 | 2026-03-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | 0 | 2026-05-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2026-05-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 4 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2026-05-13 |
Every page liveplan.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What LivePlan's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: liveplan.com, liveplan.com/pricing, liveplan.com/policies/security, liveplan.com/features/perks, liveplan.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LivePlan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LivePlan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LivePlan by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: