AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Lucanet xP&A · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Lucanet xP&A

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lucanet xP&A was named 1 time in Financial modeling, where Microsoft Excel led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial modeling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lucanet xP&A for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Financial modeling and scenario planningPlanning and analysis0%35 of 770%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Excel at 14%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Lucanet xP&A held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Financial modeling · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 66 → 46 of 103
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 45 → 35 of 75

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Financial modeling0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 45 → 35 of 77

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Lucanet xP&A across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Lucanet xP&A — Best for Financial Strategy” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial modeling · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lucanet xP&A, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lucanet xP&A was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cube2 of 20Not among the top eight
Clockwork1 of 21Not among the top eight
Datarails1 of 21Not among the top eight
Abacum1 of 20Not among the top eight
Jirav1 of 20Not among the top eight
LiveFlow1 of 20Not among the top eight
Mosaic1 of 20Not among the top eight
Runway1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lucanet xP&A. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Lucanet xP&A and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

irisfinance.co2
abacum.ai1
aicentralresources.com1
barchart.com1
bestinvestingtools.com1
cfoshortlist.com1
cledara.com1
clockwork.ai1
cubesoftware.com1
datarails.com1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Lucanet xP&A came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

lucanet.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lucanet xP&A takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Excel takes 14%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “modeling tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial modeling software”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 342 a month
Searches its site ranks for
248 · 9 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,674
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 35 of 77 in financial modeling
Segment leader
14%
Microsoft Excel
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on lucanet.com
2,532
subdomains included
Content
379
counted in the table below
Documentation
752
Product · Integration
33 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog163122026-09-23ESG and carbon reporting, Accounting software
Case study68undatedFinancial consolidation
Report or ebook67undatedFinancial consolidation, Accounting software
Webinar or virtual event4802025-12-02Financial consolidation
News or press1812026-08-11
Podcast or video7undated
Comparison3undatedLease accounting
Glossary or explainer3undated
Conference or event202025-11-12
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lucanet.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name financial consolidation (11); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Lucanet xP&A

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Lucanet xP&A is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
designed to unify financial and operational planning for faster, smarter decision-making
For
finance teams
Integrations claimed
300 lucanet.com/en/platform
Certifications
IDW PS 880ISM system – ISO/IEC 27001: IS 714969ISMS Cloud Security – ISO/IEC 27017: Certificate No. CLOUD 776088PII processors – ISO/IEC 27018: Certificate No. PII 776089SSAE 18 SOC 1 TYPE 2ISAE 3402 SOC 1 TYPE 2IDW PS 951 n.F. SOC I TYPE BSSAE 18 SOC 2 TYPE 1
Hosting
in your region
Customers named
HotelatelierVAUDEMylight150Basic-FitHabitat en RégionVenterraBitpandaCondor
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial

What Lucanet xP&A's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: lucanet.com, trust.lucanet.com, lucanet.com/en/platform, lucanet.com/fr/customers, lucanet.com/en/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lucanet xP&A's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lucanet xP&A, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lucanet xP&A by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Lucanet xP&A is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lucanet xP&A, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lucanet.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.