Every category where a model named Lukka for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Crypto accounting	Accounting and close	0%	16 of 54	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Bitwave at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lukka yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lukka across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Lukka is best suited for enterprises and institutional crypto businesses needing high-integrity, audit-focused data management” Muse Glimmer 30B · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you need institutional-grade data infrastructure more than a user-facing tax app: Lukka.” GPT-5.4 mini · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Consolidation across sources | Major | Custom ERP | Funds/corporates” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · scale prompt · alternative

“Lukka – Institutional focus, high-integrity data management” Kimi K2 · Crypto accounting · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Bitwave or Lukka may be better if your business is heavily BTC-focused ... more specialized than a budget-first choice” Perplexity Sonar · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lukka, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lukka was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bitwave23 of 2412Not among the top eight

Cryptio22 of 243Not among the top eight

TRES Finance18 of 244Not among the top eight

TaxBit14 of 240Not among the top eight

Koinly11 of 243Not among the top eight

Ledgible8 of 242Not among the top eight

SoftLedger8 of 241Not among the top eight

CoinLedger8 of 240Not among the top eight

Cryptoworth7 of 241Not among the top eight

CoinTracker6 of 241Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lukka. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Lukka and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spark.money20

bitwave.io16

tres.finance16

coinledger.io12

fitsmallbusiness.com11

techdogs.com11

cryptoworth.com10

g2.com8

worldmetrics.org8

gitnux.org7

119 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Lukka came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

spark.money/tools/crypto-accounting-software-comparison20

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-cryptocurrency-accounting-software11

techdogs.com/td-articles/product-mine/best-crypto-accounting-software10

tres.finance/finos-crypto-accounting-software/top-5-crypto-accounting-software-for-enterpr10

coinledger.io/tools/best-crypto-accounting-software9

g2.com/categories/crypto-accounting7

cryptoworth.com/blog/blockchain-accounting-software6

gitnux.org/best/blockchain-accounting-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

lukka.tech is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lukka takes 0% of first choices and Bitwave takes 27%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “crypto accounting platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “crypto accounting platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“lukka”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 49 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 425 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 129 · 4 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,454
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

4 ads · 4 text · 3 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2025, as Lukka, Inc, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 16 of 54 in crypto accounting

Segment leader

27%

Bitwave

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 24 answers
Its own site cited: in 24 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on lukka.tech

180

subdomains included

Content

107

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	99	17	2026-10-01	Crypto accounting
Conference or event	3	3	2026-08-14
News or press	3	0	2026-06-18
Case study	1	1	2026-07-08
Report or ebook	1	0	2026-06-16

Most recent

2026-10-01Two regulators one week what the feds genius act proposals and the secs new faqs mean for institutions blog
2026-09-23Stablecoins as settlement what it takes for institutions to actually use them blog
2026-09-17A stablecoin isnt a cash equivalent until you can prove it what fasbs new proposal actually requires blog
2026-09-04The harvard club cocktail reception blog
2026-08-26A deep dive on lukkas end to end platform blog
2026-08-19Regulation crypto assets why regulatory clarity raises the bar for digital asset data infrastructure blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lukka.tech exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Lukka

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Lukka is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Digital Asset Data Operating System
lukka.tech
For: institutions
lukka.tech
Integrations claimed: 350 lukka.tech
Certifications: SOC 1 Type I & Type IISOC 2 Type I & Type IIISO/IEC 27001NIST Cybersecurity AssessmentIOSCO Principles for Financial BenchmarksSOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IIAICPA SOC Reports
Hosting: U.S.EuropeBrazilSingaporeJapanAustralia
Customers named: ShapeShiftCoinSharesBolder GroupHashdexRichey MayAtlas Fund ServicesArca FundsTrident Fund Services
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial

What Lukka's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: lukka.tech, lukka.tech/pricing-market-data, lukka.tech/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lukka's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lukka, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lukka by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Lukka is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lukka, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.