Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 17 of 81
1 category · Named, not rankedNav Business
12Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Nav Business was named 3 times in B2B credit management, where Chaser led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 86
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market27 of 108
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Nav Business for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 27 of 108 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Chaser at 16% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Nav Business held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · B2B credit management · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 14 → 26 of 97
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 27 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Nav Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Nav Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need both personal and business monitoring plus funding access, Nav is more comprehensive.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · B2B credit management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Nav Business – Ultra-Budget Option ... Basic credit reports, monitoring, and alerts” Kimi K2 · B2B credit management · budget prompt · alternative
“For pure credit risk/data: Nav, Experian, or D&B are cheaper starters.” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B credit management · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nav Business, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nav Business was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nav Business, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nav Business was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nav Business. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 12 answers that named Nav Business and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
chaserhq.com6
g2.com6
merclex.com6
tesorio.com6
finance-ai-index.com5
nav.comYour site5
paidnice.com5
resolvepay.com5
worldmetrics.org5
slashdot.org4
Forty-eight of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Nav Business came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
nav.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nav Business takes 0% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.ShowHide
Search and answers
nav.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nav Business takes 0% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “credit management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b credit management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“nav business”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 111 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 322,302 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 39,129 · 1,551 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,686
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $54 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 108 in B2B credit management
Segment leader
16%
Chaser
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on nav.com
1,050
subdomains included
Content
509
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 9
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 423 | undated | Business banking, Cash flow forecasting | ||
| Comparison | 33 | 0 | 2026-01-12 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 22 | undated | |||
| News or press | 14 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 10 | undated | |||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-01-12Payment processing vs payment gateways comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page nav.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Nav Business
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nav Business; a claim can dispute any of them.
Nav 1
Follow Nav Business
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Nav Business is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Nav Business is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The credit platform small business owners call home
- For
- small business owners
- Price stated
- Free $0/mo; Track $39.99/mo; Build $49.99/mo; Expand $74.99/mo nav.com
- Starting price
- 0 nav.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free $0/mo nav.com
- Customers named
- Edward Y.Sergio C.Jonathan C.Tyler J.BCK RanchElite Wellness SolutionsGuapaholicsBGG Logistics
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Nav Business's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: nav.com, nav.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nav Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nav Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nav Business by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Nav Business is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nav Business, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.