Small business▼−1Since September 2026: 6% → 5%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 5 of 81
1 category · RankedCreditsafe
60Judge labels
5First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in B2B credit management for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 108 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 25 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Creditsafe →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 86
6%21 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 108
4%25 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise13 of 80
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Creditsafe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 4% | 7 of 108 | 0% | 25 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Creditsafe held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · B2B credit management · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 9 of 97
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 12 → 13 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | 6% | 2% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 7 of 108 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Creditsafe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Creditsafe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labelsNone
Paraphrase17 labels5
Comparative14 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Top Recommendation: Creditsafe ... is the strongest fit because it strikes the best balance between cost, global coverage, and user experience.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B credit management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need customer credit checks: start with Creditsafe or D&B Finance Analytics Credit Intelligence.” GPT-5.4 mini · B2B credit management · comparative prompt · first choice
“My default pick for a mid-sized U.S. B2B company is Creditsafe” GPT-6 Luna · B2B credit management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Provides business credit reports, scores, and monitoring alerts with broad international coverage, at a price point that suits mid-market teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · B2B credit management · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Creditsafe, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Creditsafe was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Creditsafe, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Creditsafe was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Creditsafe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 60 answers that named Creditsafe and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com36
worldmetrics.org28
creditpulse.com25
nuvo.com25
chaserhq.com24
highradius.com24
guideflow.com23
learn.g2.com21
esker.com19
tesorio.com19
244 of the 244 domain citations in answers naming Creditsafe came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
creditsafe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Creditsafe takes 4% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.ShowHide
Search and answers
creditsafe.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Creditsafe takes 4% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “credit management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b credit management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 4,400 a month (“creditsafe”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 70 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 59,141 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 29,295 · 249 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,542
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 108 in B2B credit management
Segment leader
16%
Chaser
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 60 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 55 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on creditsafe.com
3,777
subdomains included
Content
1,357
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
20 · 43
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 978 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| News or press | 195 | 0 | 2026-03-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 78 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Report or ebook | 35 | 14 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Case study | 22 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Comparison | 18 | 0 | 2026-04-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 18 | 0 | 2026-01-28 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-03-13 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | 6 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2022-09-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Business Credit Reports & Credit Score | Creditsafe report or ebook
- 2026-09-09Webinarer webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-02Insolvencies report or ebook
- 2026-09-02Videos webinars webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-02Podcasts podcast or video
- 2026-09-02Podcast talkshow impactradar podcast or video
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page creditsafe.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Creditsafe
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Creditsafe; a claim can dispute any of them.
CreditSafe 2
Follow Creditsafe
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Creditsafe is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Creditsafe is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Business Credit Reports & Credit Score
- For
- Businesses worldwide; credit professionals
- Price stated
- Pricing is customized to how you use the platform. creditsafe.com
- Free plan or trial
- Get a free business credit report; Free Trial; limited free API access creditsafe.com
- Certifications
- Voted number one for credit and collections and financial risk management by G2DORAGDPRISO 22301ISO/IEC 27001NIS2PCI DSSSOC 2
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers
What Creditsafe's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: creditsafe.com, trust.creditsafe.com, creditsafe.com/it/it/product/privacy.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Creditsafe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Creditsafe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Creditsafe by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Creditsafe is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Creditsafe, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.