Small business▼−9Since September 2026: 16% → 7%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 2 → 3 of 81
3 categories · RankedPaidnice
49Judge labels
17First choices
2Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Accounts receivable auto for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 108 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 86
8%18 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 108
10%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise67 of 80
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Paidnice for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 10% | 4 of 108 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Chaser at 16% | ▲+8Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 2% | 19 of 79 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 35 of 83 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Paidnice held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · B2B credit management · by segment
Mid-market▲+8Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 10 → 4 of 97
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 61 of 74, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B credit management | 2% | 10% | ▲+8Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 4 of 108 |
| Accounts receivable auto | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 63 → 19 of 79 |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 35 of 83, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Paidnice across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Paidnice across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels4
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative12 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained26 labels12
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Satago at ~£45/mo and Paidnice from £49/$69/mo are the lowest-cost options, with Paidnice adding automatic late fees/interest posting and unlimited users on Pro.” Muse Glimmer 30B · B2B credit management · budget prompt · first choice
“Paidnice – Best Value for Small Businesses ... Tightest budget: Start with Paidnice at $69/month” Kimi K2 · B2B credit management · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Chaser or Paidnice if you need end-to-end automation + integrations on a tight budget” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B credit management · budget prompt · first choice
“Paidnice is especially worth considering for its flat-rate pricing and robust features” Mistral Small · Accounts receivable auto · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Paidnice, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Paidnice was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Paidnice, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Paidnice was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Paidnice. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 49 answers that named Paidnice and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
paidnice.comYour site41
chaserhq.com38
g2.com22
worldmetrics.org18
guideflow.com16
itechguides.com16
sourceforge.net16
erpresearch.com14
resolvepay.com14
tesorio.com12
166 of the 207 domain citations in answers naming Paidnice came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
paidnice.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Paidnice takes 10% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.ShowHide
Search and answers
paidnice.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Paidnice takes 10% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “credit management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b credit management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“paidnice”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 16,387 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,693 · 271 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,204
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 4 of 108 in B2B credit management
Segment leader
16%
Chaser
- First choices
- 17 across its categories
- Named in
- 49 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 49 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on paidnice.com
682
subdomains included
Content
255
counted in the table below
Documentation
92
Product · Integration
0 · 13
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 189 | 61 | 2026-09-28 | Accounts receivable auto | |
| Comparison | 26 | 14 | 2026-09-25 | Accounts receivable auto | |
| Template or tool | 19 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Case study | 13 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 1 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2024-07-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Sterner reminders most overdue customers xero blog
- 2026-09-28Xero invoice reminders wrong person blog
- 2026-09-28Xero reminder reply to address blog
- 2026-09-25Credit control software compared blog
- 2026-09-25Credit control software vs debt collection agency comparison
- 2026-09-24Accounts receivable automation xero blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page paidnice.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Paidnice
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Paidnice is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Paidnice is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- accounts receivable automation for Xero and QuickBooks
- For
- Finance teams
- Price stated
- $69 paidnice.com
- Starting price
- 69 paidnice.com
- Free plan or trial
- Try it Free paidnice.com
- Integrations claimed
- 3 paidnice.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001NIST Cybersecurity FrameworkXero SSAMIntuit security standardsSOC 2GDPRPCI DSS Level 1
- Hosting
- Google Cloud Platform
- Customers named
- Salt SiloBalance My BooksThe Bean Counters
What Paidnice's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: paidnice.com, paidnice.com/pricing, paidnice.com/security, paidnice.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Paidnice's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Paidnice, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Paidnice by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Paidnice is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Paidnice, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.