AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › NEWTON · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

NEWTON

7Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NEWTON was named 3 times in Entity management, where Athennian led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named NEWTON for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Entity managementEquity and corporate0%22 of 810%3under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, NEWTON held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Entity management · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 13 → 50 of 94
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 57 → 21 of 79
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 27 → 54 of 77

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Entity management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 57 → 22 of 81

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated NEWTON across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“NEWTON - a legal entity management software that centralizes data, automates compliance, and manages documents securely” Llama 4 Maverick · Entity management · direct prompt · alternative
“Newton (Best for European Operations)” Kimi K2 · Entity management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as NEWTON, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NEWTON was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Athennian4 of 72Not among the top eight
Diligent Entities4 of 71Not among the top eight
Filejet3 of 70Not among the top eight
Discern2 of 72Not among the top eight
Commenda2 of 71Not among the top eight
EntityKeeper2 of 71Not among the top eight
ContractZen1 of 71Not among the top eight
Fides1 of 71Not among the top eight
CSC Entity Management1 of 70Not among the top eight
CT Corporation Entity Management1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NEWTON. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named NEWTON and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getapp.com5
techbullion.com5
zipdo.co4
discern.com3
g2.com3
parse.gl3
sourceforge.net3
commenda.io2
filejet.com2
gitnux.org2

Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming NEWTON came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on get-newton.com
52
subdomains included
Content
32
counted in the table below
Documentation
10
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog2802026-04-27Entity management
Glossary or explainer302023-05-02Entity management
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page get-newton.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as NEWTON

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as NEWTON; a claim can dispute any of them.
Newton 1

Follow NEWTON

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

NEWTON is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Legal entity management, compliance tracking, and document storage in one platform.
For
finance, cosec, and operations teams
Price stated
Smart SMB from €59 per month, 14-day free trial get-newton.com
Starting price
59 get-newton.com
Free plan or trial
14-day free trial get-newton.com
Certifications
EU data residency
Hosting
EU
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, customers

What NEWTON's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: get-newton.com, get-newton.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NEWTON's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NEWTON, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NEWTON by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where NEWTON is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name NEWTON, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at get-newton.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.