| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 82 of 94 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Ecommerce fraud prevention | Receivables and billing | 0% | 68 of 70 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SEON at 16% | |
| Embedded payments platforms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 93 of 110 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Stripe Connect at 53% | |
| Payment orchestration platforms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 62 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BlueSnap at 18% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 82 of 94 |
| Ecommerce fraud | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 68 of 70, unchanged |
| Embedded payments | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 93 of 110, unchanged |
| Payment orchestration | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 81, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“FTC settlement (2026) for $4.85M over processing $30M+ in fraudulent charges” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · hard negative
“examples of providers to be cautious about ... Nuvei — the FTC announced in September 2026 a settlement over allegations that it enabled certain deceptive merchant activity” GPT-5.4 mini · Embedded payments · negative prompt · soft negative
“the FTC lists actions against Nuvei for allegedly failing to screen merchants robustly enough” GPT-5.4 mini · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Nuvei and are not a share of its labels.
Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Nuvei came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,810 | undated | Account reconciliation, Accounts receivable auto | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 55 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 44 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 33 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 24 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 12 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 10 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated |
Every page nuvei.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Nuvei's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: nuvei.com, nuvei.com/solutions/apm, nuvei.com/post-category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nuvei's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nuvei, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nuvei by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: