| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 66 of 94 | 40% | 20 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cross-border payments and FX | Treasury and cash | 0% | 87 of 87 | 73% | 15 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Embedded payments platforms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 25 of 110 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Stripe Connect at 53% | |
| Chargeback management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 73 of 81 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24% | |
| Payment orchestration platforms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 24 of 81 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by BlueSnap at 18% | |
| Merchants of record | Receivables and billing | 0% | 35 of 45 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Paddle at 28% | |
| B2B BNPL and net terms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 79 of 90 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Resolve Pay at 56% | |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 84 of 98 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Stablecoin platforms | Treasury and cash | 0% | 40 of 141 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BVNK at 23% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 61 → 66 of 94 |
| Cross-border payments | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 82 → 87 of 87 |
| Embedded payments | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 110, unchanged |
| Chargeback management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 73 of 81, unchanged |
| Payment orchestration | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 81, unchanged |
| Merchants of record | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 35 of 45, unchanged |
| B2B BNPL and terms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 79 of 90, unchanged |
| Business bill pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 64 → 84 of 98 |
| Stablecoin platforms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 40 of 141, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“USDC or PYUSD are generally considered safer due to their strict regulatory oversight.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Stablecoin platforms · comparative prompt · first choice
“Consumer preference and trust; ideal when your customers are already PayPal users. Higher fees but potentially higher conversion.” Kimi K2 · Embedded payments · comparative prompt · alternative
“Stick with well-established, regulated platforms such as Wise Business, Payoneer, Stripe, Airwallex, Adyen, or PayPal” Mistral Small · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · alternative
“PayPal if customers already prefer paying through PayPal or Venmo and you want simple invoices” GPT-6 Luna · B2B payment acceptance · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“PayPal's automated risk system freezes accounts and holds funds for 180 days without appeal. This is the most-reported PayPal complaint” Muse Glimmer 30B · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · hard negative
“Account freezes — Well-documented history of holding funds for "review," which can cripple a B2B operation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid traditional banks (3\u20135% total costs) and PayPal (can approach ~8% with fees and FX markups)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cross-border payments · budget prompt · hard negative
“Extremely poor Trustpilot rating (1.3/5). B2B complaints include limited POS support, high fees” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B BNPL and terms · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 168 of the 185 answers that named PayPal and are not a share of its labels.
460 of the 460 domain citations in answers naming PayPal came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 8,031 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 294 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 76 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 18 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Every page paypal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What PayPal's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: paypal.com, paypal.com/dk/enterprise/platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PayPal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PayPal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PayPal by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: