Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 40 → 93 of 104
Oracle · 2 categories · Named, not rankedOracle Fusion
13Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Fusion was named 2 times in Fixed asset accounting and 1 other category, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market95 of 107
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 109
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Fusion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 95 of 107 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 71 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Fusion held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Fixed asset accounting · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 70 → 19 of 104
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 95 of 107 |
| Internal controls | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 71 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Fusion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Fusion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Native modules can sometimes lack the depth for complex tax jurisdictions” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Fusion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 13 answers that named Oracle Fusion and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
facilio.com4
gitnux.org4
assetcues.com3
thectoclub.com3
worldmetrics.org3
bassets.net2
capterra.com2
guideflow.com2
houseblend.io2
itqlick.com2
Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Follow Oracle Fusion
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Fusion.ShowHide
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Fusion.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Our complete cloud suite of SaaS applications with embedded artificial intelligence bring consistent processes and a single source of truth across the most important business functions—from enterprise resource planning, supply chain management, and human capital management to customer experience.
- For
- customers
- Free plan or trial
- Try Oracle Fusion ERP Analytics for free oracle.com/fusion-data-intelligence/hcm-analytics
- Certifications
- 2026 ISG Buyers Guide™ for AI Agents
- Customers named
- GloboGrupo GloboCloud Software Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What Oracle Fusion's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: marketplace.oracle.com/fusion+applications, oracle.com/applications/fusion-ai, oracle.com/fusion-data-intelligence/hcm-analytics, oracle.com/customers/globo-oracle-fusion-cloud-erp, oracle.com/customers/cloud-software-group-fusion-apps. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Fusion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Fusion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Fusion by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Fusion is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Fusion, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.