| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 2% | 8 of 136 | 17% | 23 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 0% | 20 of 54 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 24 of 87 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 55 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% | |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 45 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 56 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 46 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 8 of 136 |
| Accounts payable automat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 20 of 54 |
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 71 → 24 of 87 |
| Business bill pay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 98, unchanged |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 83, unchanged |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 56 of 101, unchanged |
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 46 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the strongest, most‑balanced e‑invoicing compliance platforms are Tradeshift, Basware, Sovos, Pagero, and Avalara” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · first choice
“For 100-country multinational compliance coverage, Basware is recommended” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · first choice
“Global compliance needs: Basware, Sovos, Pagero” MiniMax M2.5 · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · first choice
“Particularly relevant when the goal is not only compliance but also reducing manual invoice handling.” GPT-6 Luna · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid enterprise giants like Basware or Trullion, as they often have high minimums.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · hard negative
“geared toward larger or multinational businesses, so they are usually *not* the best budget choice” Perplexity Sonar · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · soft negative
“Using them for a small number of invoices can be overkill and may not be cost-effective.” Mistral Small · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · soft negative
“pricing is quote-based, so it's usually less budget-friendly for smaller companies” GPT-5.4 mini · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 145 of the 150 answers that named Basware and are not a share of its labels.
372 of the 372 domain citations in answers naming Basware came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 599 | 1 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| News or press | 86 | 5 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Case study | 71 | 0 | 2026-05-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 47 | 2 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 23 | 0 | 2026-01-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 8 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 0 | 2023-03-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2025-10-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2025-07-01 |
As the event pages on basware.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page basware.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Basware's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: basware.com, basware.com/en/pricing, basware.com/en/why-basware/trust, basware.com/en/solutions/industries, basware.com/en/why-basware/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Basware's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Basware, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Basware by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: