| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 2% | 23 of 83 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Payment orchestration platforms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 23 of 81 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by BlueSnap at 18% | |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 31 of 94 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 38 of 79 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 23 of 83 |
| Payment orchestration | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 81, unchanged |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 31 of 94 |
| Accounts receivable auto | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 76 → 38 of 79 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“or Paystand if you want invoice delivery + payment matching in one AR stack” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cash application · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Paystand (zero-fee B2B network, invoice delivery, payment matching, collections)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Payment orchestration · direct prompt · alternative
“Paystand stands out if you want to automate invoice-to-payment workflows” MiniMax M2.5 · Payment orchestration · direct prompt · alternative
“Paystand is a highly attractive mid-market option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Crypto/ACH-heavy; narrower than full AR suite.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash application · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named Paystand and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-five of the sixty domain citations in answers naming Paystand came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 491 | 15 | 2026-09-18 | Cash application, Accounting software | |
| Report or ebook | 68 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 38 | 1 | 2026-07-27 | Expense management, ERP systems | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 36 | 0 | 2023-10-18 | ||
| Case study | 23 | 0 | 2021-07-07 | ||
| Comparison | 16 | 1 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2025-05-28 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on paystand.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page paystand.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Paystand's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: paystand.com, paystand.com/pricing, trust.paystand.com, paystand.com/solutions/enterprise-blockchain, paystand.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Paystand's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Paystand, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Paystand by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: