Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 5 of 82
BILL · 4 categories · RankedBILL Accounts Receivable
226Judge labels
21First choices
53Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Accounts receivable auto for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 94 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 42 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of BILL Accounts Receivable →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 87
10%50 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 94
6%42 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise9 of 105
2%34 labels
criticized challenger
In b2b payment acceptance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named BILL Accounts Receivable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 6% | 6 of 94 | 17% | 42 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 2% | 11 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 2% | 14 of 79 | 39% | 31 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 44 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, BILL Accounts Receivable held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · B2B payment acceptance · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 7 → 6 of 84
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 87 → 9 of 89
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | 4% | 7% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 6 of 94 |
| Accounts receivable auto | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 14 of 79 |
| Invoicing software | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 11 of 71, unchanged |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 44 of 83, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated BILL Accounts Receivable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated BILL Accounts Receivable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct38 labels9
Paraphrase33 labels7
Comparative61 labels13not counted in share
Budget-constrained45 labels3
Scale-constrained18 labels2
Negative31 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative226 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 38 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“1. BILL (formerly Bill.com) ... Choose BILL if you want an easy-to-use platform to automate invoicing and payments” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend BILL (formerly Bill.com) as a strong starting point for an accounts receivable (AR) payment portal.” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B payment acceptance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“best value pick is usually BILL AP/AR for a small team that wants solid AR automation without enterprise pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · Accounts receivable auto · budget prompt · first choice
“BILL is the B2B payment platform to price first in 2026, at $49 per user per month on Essentials” Muse Glimmer 30B · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Bill.com (for AR specifically) ... Sync issues with QuickBooks and other ERPs ... Invoicing problems and data syncing glitches” Kimi K2 · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · hard negative
“Severe payment delays — Vendors report receiving payments 36–42 days after invoicing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · hard negative
“When to avoid: If reliable, fast payouts and responsive support are critical.” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid on a tight budget Subscription AR/AP platforms such as Bill.com are powerful for automated approvals but carry a recurring cost” Muse Glimmer 30B · B2B payment acceptance · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BILL Accounts Receivable, over the 224 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BILL Accounts Receivable was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BILL Accounts Receivable, over the 224 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BILL Accounts Receivable was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BILL Accounts Receivable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 217 of the 224 answers that named BILL Accounts Receivable and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
highradius.com87
bill.comYour site64
learn.g2.com63
fitsmallbusiness.com58
g2.com56
wise.com54
chaserhq.com52
techrepublic.com51
upflow.io49
resolvepay.com46
516 of the 580 domain citations in answers naming BILL Accounts Receivable came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
bill.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BILL Accounts Receivable takes 6% of first choices and Versapay takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
bill.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BILL Accounts Receivable takes 6% of first choices and Versapay takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b payment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b payment acceptance platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“bill accounts receivable”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 56 a month
- Its company's site
- bill.com shared with BILL's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,783,039 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 72,278 · 6,684 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 11,288
- Paid Google search
- 45 searches its ads show for, about 5,920 clicks and $199,231 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 6 of 94 in B2B payment acceptance
Segment leader
19%
Versapay
- First choices
- 21 across its categories
- Named in
- 224 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 217 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as BILL Accounts Receivable
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BILL Accounts Receivable; a claim can dispute any of them.
BILL 29Bill.com 16BILL (formerly Bill.com) 14BILL (Bill.com) 4BILL AP/AR 4Bill.com (BILL) 2BILL / Bill.com 1BILL/AvidXchange 1
Follow BILL Accounts Receivable
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
BILL is the company behind BILL Accounts Receivable.ShowHide
The company
BILL is the company behind BILL Accounts Receivable.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Streamline how you pay and get paid
- For
- growing businesses
- Free plan or trial
- Sign up for a trial to get started. bill.com/product/accounts-receivable
- Integrations claimed
- 5 bill.com/topics/accounts-receivable
- Customers named
- The Collective GoodFisherEngineeringInsight GlobalCertified Pro AdvisorsFirst Baptist Church TrussvilleConstruction & Engineering Company
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, certifications, hosting
What BILL Accounts Receivable's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bill.com/topics/accounts-receivable, bill.com/product/accounts-receivable, bill.com/learning/accounts-receivable, bill.com/learning/accounts-receivable-days, bill.com/learning/accounts-receivable-fraud. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BILL Accounts Receivable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BILL Accounts Receivable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BILL Accounts Receivable by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where BILL Accounts Receivable is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name BILL Accounts Receivable, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.